Skip to main content

The last tree in Wied il-Għasel

This was my letter published in the Times issue of Friday 29th June 2012



I proudly declare that I am one of the 24,000 ignored signatories of the petition to revoke the permit for the development of apartments at the edge of Wied il-Għasel in Mosta.

This decision, and others before it, should lead us to ask whether it makes sense to give up further pristine land for construction, considering we live on a rock of barely 316 square kilometres where 76,000 properties lie vacant.

An article in this newspaper on April 13 penned by Mario de Marco had given us a glimmer of hope: a political will to direct the construction industry away from the construction of further blocks of apartments, especially on pristine land, and towards the rehabilitation of old and vacant buildings to rehabilitate and give life to our village cores.

That political will though still needs to be put into action. It seems that the Malta Environment and Planning Authority still lacks policies with regard to the best use of our very limited space, and urgent political direction is needed in this regard. We cannot allow the rape of our country to go on relentlessly, with the excuse that it’s in the interest of the economy. It’s true that a big chunk of our gross domestic product is dependent on the construction industry. So are thousands of jobs. But that’s something which we should be finding our way out of, and not keep strengthening.

What I found most appalling is that while the government is showing signs of awareness that the construction industry needs to adapt to new realities and shift its focus on the reuse and renovation of existing properties, while the government is working on the Strategic Policy for Environment and Development (SPED) which will determine how we make best use of our land and spaces, while the government is launching initiatives to owners of vacant properties to put them into use, we have an opposition presenting itself as an alternative government, which reportedly promises development permits to those who had problems with Mepa, which promises land reclamation projects which countless studies have concluded to be unfeasible, unsustainable and which increase dependence on property speculation, and which promises to again subsidise applications for construction (contradicting the previously vaunted polluter-pays principle).

Remembering the Dubai tour by Labour MPs before the last election when a number of private contractors also happened to be there, I hope this thorny issue doesn’t end up showcasing one of the main ills and causes of the modern social and economic crisis: the free-market turning into a market-state where centralised economic policies are dictated by politicians who are under the control of the big capitalists who finance them.

I trust in the goodwill of people like the Dr de Marco, and his vision to have the construction industry transform and adapt to today’s realities, safeguarding what’s left of our environment and hopefully stop the property balloon from becoming a threat to our economy.

When supply keeps increasing at a much faster rate than demand, it is obvious that if not acted upon the balloon will sooner or later burst, bringing on an economic crisis similar to what has happened in other countries.

A difficult decision was taken when the government down-sized the dockyards because they had become unsustainable and dependent on our taxes. The construction industry is being subsidised not by our taxes, but by our health and environment. And that makes it much more alarming and urgent to tackle.

To put it bluntly, this country cannot afford its economy to keep on depending so heavily on its unsustainable rape. Otherwise, tomorrow’s New Cuorey won’t be singing about the last farmer of Wied il-Għasel, but about its last tree.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who's the real monster?

I usually hate comparisons, but some very different reactions from the 'great unthinking' rabble do merit some analysis. In May this year, the notorious dog Star was found buried alive . A prima facie , this looked liked the most horrific case of animal cruelty, and is still considered so by some. The perpetrator was described by the sensitive and caring animal-lovers as a villain, a heartless monster, deserving of death, stoning, or even to be 'buried alive in the same manner'. But what did Mr. Vella actually do, according to the testimony heard in Court? Star was sick. It was shedding fur, and quite old already, and its owner did not afford the treatment. In trying to save some money from paying for the dog to be put to sleep and killed properly by vets, she gave it to Mr. Vella to have it killed himself. Nothing much to make people angry till now. Mercy-killing of very sick and suffering animals is widely done and usually acceptable. You may

Shema Yisrael, the cries of the Palestinian people

You live a peaceful life in a modest home. You've never bothered anyone and you've never caused trouble. Out of the blues, a group of people claim that they should live in your house. Why? Because they have been persecuted in a war, and they claim that some 5,000 years ago, their God had told them your home was their promised land. Somehow, the whole community agrees with their wishes, and asks you to grant them your spare-bedroom. You oblige. After a few months, they take the whole top-floor. In a few year's time, they take over your kitchen. After a few more years, they own your house and keep you and your family locked in the bathroom. They don't even allow you to get out, while they strip-search you the few times they do. Even if it's a medical emergency. Sometimes not even medical personnel and ambulances are allowed to see to your needs while your children die in your hands. Desperation starts hitting you. Life seems to offer no hopes. In moments

Why I am dropping out of the Anti-ACTA protest

Like many avid internet users, I have followed with interest the debate about ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement). After reading numerous articles, watched sensational videos, and discussed ad nauseam with friends, I have realized that what I have come across is a campaign hi-jacked by lies, myths and misconceptions as to rival Malta's misinformed divorce referendum campaign. I have to say that the videos on Youtube   got me worried. I quickly signed the petition, joined the Anti-ACTA groups, and prepared myself for a full-blown fight against the big-governments who want to intrude on our privacy and freedom of expression. Like our MEP Edward Scicluna invited us to do in the University debate last Wednesday, I did not try to understand the details of ACTA but rather saw who the players behind it were. But as usual, my logical instincts took over, and his call to not try to understand ACTA actually pushed me to read the text. And here's what I now know: ACTA is