Skip to main content

Abusing a misinformed public

In a previous blog-post I highlighted the emptiness of Labour's promise for the local council elections, that of issuing public calls to select people to attend for local council meetings considering tender adjudications.


Tomorrow, Thursday 22nd March 2012, the Gudja Local Council I form part of is meeting at 5.30pm. One of the topics on the agenda (which may be accessed online): five tender adjudications related to road works, footpaths and gardens. As it has been required by law since the local council's inception in 1993, all the public is invited to attend. No public calls were issued, no personal inviations, no selection process to choose who can or cannot attend.

I am mentioning this fact again because it irks me when politicians, aware of the fact that many people are ignorant of certain facts, instead of informing them of their rights abuse of this lack of awareness to make empty and inane promises. I am using the above case as an example, but this happens frequently and from exponents on both sides of the political divide.

How well democracy functions, and how much politicians need to speak the truth, depends on only one thing: how informed and educated the people are. Because though democracy is not perfect, it gives the people the leadership they deserve.

The people need to inform themselves, think, and form their own opinions. Do not just take someone's opinion and make it your own. Do not form your opinions just on media and newspaper headlines, which report everything at face-value without proper analysis.

The sustainability of democracy depends on how smart its people are. The only way the people can force parties to offer political solutions to political problems, instead of the usual promises of heaven on earth, is by rising above their marketing and media-stunts and analyze the policies and their effects.

Your country's future depends on it.

Comments

  1. Tajba Mark. And the example extends to so many other issues... I am particularly concerned about the "reformists" of our body of laws.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Elezzjoni għal Viċi Kap

Nemmen li l-Partit Nazzjonalista jeħtieġ Viċi-Kap li jkompli jsaħħaħ il-proċess ta' tiġdid li għaddej minnu l-Partit stess, biex ikun jista' jkompli jwettaq il-bidliet pożittivi f'pajjiżna. Għalhekk kien ta' pjaċir għalija li nhar is-Sibt li għadda kont wieħed minn tal-ewwel li iffirmajt in-nomina ta' Dr. Simon Busuttil għal din il-kariga tant importanti. Nawguralu minn qalbi.

Why I am dropping out of the Anti-ACTA protest

Like many avid internet users, I have followed with interest the debate about ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement). After reading numerous articles, watched sensational videos, and discussed ad nauseam with friends, I have realized that what I have come across is a campaign hi-jacked by lies, myths and misconceptions as to rival Malta's misinformed divorce referendum campaign. I have to say that the videos on Youtube   got me worried. I quickly signed the petition, joined the Anti-ACTA groups, and prepared myself for a full-blown fight against the big-governments who want to intrude on our privacy and freedom of expression. Like our MEP Edward Scicluna invited us to do in the University debate last Wednesday, I did not try to understand the details of ACTA but rather saw who the players behind it were. But as usual, my logical instincts took over, and his call to not try to understand ACTA actually pushed me to read the text. And here's what I now know: ACTA is ...

Who's the real monster?

I usually hate comparisons, but some very different reactions from the 'great unthinking' rabble do merit some analysis. In May this year, the notorious dog Star was found buried alive . A prima facie , this looked liked the most horrific case of animal cruelty, and is still considered so by some. The perpetrator was described by the sensitive and caring animal-lovers as a villain, a heartless monster, deserving of death, stoning, or even to be 'buried alive in the same manner'. But what did Mr. Vella actually do, according to the testimony heard in Court? Star was sick. It was shedding fur, and quite old already, and its owner did not afford the treatment. In trying to save some money from paying for the dog to be put to sleep and killed properly by vets, she gave it to Mr. Vella to have it killed himself. Nothing much to make people angry till now. Mercy-killing of very sick and suffering animals is widely done and usually a...