Skip to main content

More Big-Government



Monday evening I was listening to Parliament. Yes, if it's between Monday and Wednesday, between 6pm and 9pm, and I'm driving, I frequently happen to tune in to Parliament's transmission. I admit sometimes it's boring, sometimes it verges on the hilarious, but in any case, it's the best way you get to know what your representatives are discussing and what they really believe in. It's a much better way by which to judge them than by the way they dress and by how cute they look in their pre-election flyers.

A particular exchange which caught my attention was between the Hon. Helena Dalli and Minister George Pullicino. From what I could understand, the Hon. Dalli was asking the Minister about the costs of a leaflet printed and circulated by the Environmental Landscapes Consortium Ltd (known as ELC). The Minister replied that this was not a governmental department, but a private company which had won a public tender for landscaping. He was neither aware nor interested in the printing and circulating of this leaflet. Still, the Hon. Dalli kept insisting that since the company's projects are public, the government 'should have a say in what the company does'. The Minister rightly pointed out if that were the case, the government should for example also have a say in insurance companies which cover public properties. We should discuss the contract, its adjudication, their adherence to it, the results of their work, but not their internal matters, he added.

"But their work is in the public sphere," re-iterated the lady.
"Well then we should also have a say in what newspapers print, because that's in the public sphere as well. We're not a Soviet country," the Minister replied.

The Hon. Dalli closed off the exchange by showing her disappointment that the Minister had used "such strong and offensive language." Yes, the word Soviet seems to be a really offensive word nowadays.

What Hon. Dalli showed here is that this country is obsessed with big-governance. We want the government to take care of everything and everywhere, to sort out everything and everyone, even to have a say in private companies' leaflets it now seems. Authorities and boards for all sorts of imaginable things keep mushrooming. And the Opposition? It just keeps asking for more. You could almost see a pattern in these past months. A few examples:
  • Owen Bonnici, Labour MP, asked the Public Accounts Committee to investigate how the KSU (University Students Council) is administrating its building. Yes big-brother, check out how one of Malta's oldest autonomous and financially independent bodies representing students is administering its building instead of letting students settle their matters out between themselves in their elections and fora. Let's once again have a government which meddles in student affairs, going against the very basics of what autonomous means;
  • Camen Sammut, the newly-appointed chairperson of Labour's think-tank Ideat (taking over from Aaron Farrugia who is now secretary for Labour's electoral manifesto), in an otherwise interesting article on MaltaToday, ends up going the usual Labour way of blaming anything under the sun on the government. The government. That big monster who should take care and control of everything. Just when you thought this was the think-tank of ideas for a progressive party, here comes its chairperson saying that she believes that the government should intervene to replace the way University students conduct elections. Read more about this issue in a post by j'accuse;
  • And the cherry-on-the-cake of it all: Evarist Bartolo (another Labour MP and possible Minister of Education), telling us on Inkontri around three weeks ago that the Prime Minister should stop "certain bloggers": "there are ways how he can stop them." Follow the logic here: if a substantial number of people don't agree with what some other people are writing, big-brother should have ways and means to stop them. A great liberal way of thinking: you can say whatever you want as long as you agree with me and I find it acceptable, otherwise you can't. Join in the chorus an editor of a leading newsportal and another MP, who've been calling for the same measures, and then don't be surprised as to why Malta dropped 44 places in the Press Freedom Index.
It's like government interventions, government actions and government control is all we believe in. It's like we deliberately and spitefully want to give away our freedom to the power and control of politicians, hoping the next lot is better than the previous. Is this what Labour's promising? More big-government and further government-control?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Shema Yisrael, the cries of the Palestinian people

You live a peaceful life in a modest home. You've never bothered anyone and you've never caused trouble. Out of the blues, a group of people claim that they should live in your house. Why? Because they have been persecuted in a war, and they claim that some 5,000 years ago, their God had told them your home was their promised land. Somehow, the whole community agrees with their wishes, and asks you to grant them your spare-bedroom. You oblige. After a few months, they take the whole top-floor. In a few year's time, they take over your kitchen. After a few more years, they own your house and keep you and your family locked in the bathroom. They don't even allow you to get out, while they strip-search you the few times they do. Even if it's a medical emergency. Sometimes not even medical personnel and ambulances are allowed to see to your needs while your children die in your hands. Desperation starts hitting you. Life seems to offer no hopes. In moments

The Great Energy Proposal

I followed the example of a facebook comment uploaded on another blog to work out the savings my household will make with Labour's energy proposals. Our bill for of €717.80 for 7 months is divided into: An electricity service charge of €36.86 Electricity consumption of €404.83 A water service charge of €33.46 Water consumption of €242.65 Through the new tariff scheme, reducing the electricity consumption bill by 25% and the water consumption bill by 5%, our bill will read: An electricity service charge of €36.86 Electricity consumption of €303.62 A water service charge of €33.46 Water consumption of €230.52 A total of €604.46 for the same 7 months. A reduction of €16.20 a month. But this reduction comes at what price? This grand plan, the one we have been expecting for all these years, will materialize  if  we find a private investor ready to fork out €500 million in capital investment,  if  we reach a 10-year fixed price agreement,  if we manage to b

Why I am dropping out of the Anti-ACTA protest

Like many avid internet users, I have followed with interest the debate about ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement). After reading numerous articles, watched sensational videos, and discussed ad nauseam with friends, I have realized that what I have come across is a campaign hi-jacked by lies, myths and misconceptions as to rival Malta's misinformed divorce referendum campaign. I have to say that the videos on Youtube   got me worried. I quickly signed the petition, joined the Anti-ACTA groups, and prepared myself for a full-blown fight against the big-governments who want to intrude on our privacy and freedom of expression. Like our MEP Edward Scicluna invited us to do in the University debate last Wednesday, I did not try to understand the details of ACTA but rather saw who the players behind it were. But as usual, my logical instincts took over, and his call to not try to understand ACTA actually pushed me to read the text. And here's what I now know: ACTA is