Skip to main content

The big divide

The older I get, the more I realize that the greatest divide in our country lies neither in social nor in economic classes. It lies in politics. And the deepest differences in our political rivalry lies not merely in colours and flags. It is ingrained in our mentality.

Labour's General Conference last week saw a resurrection of the Mintoff personality. Joseph Muscat never misses an occasion to compare himself to the "Great Saviour", from contesting on his district, to bringing over Mintoff's daughter to address the delegates. We also endured a number of candidates, from 'experienced' ones to the new young ones, hailing how great Mintoff was and how Gonzi has ruined their lives. This led me to question: how is it possible that people in their twenties actually believe this?


Undoubtedly, Mintoff's declared plan to "create a socialist generation" succeeded in its entirety. The traditional Labour voter still believes that he depends solely on the state. He still lives in the tuna price budgets, and feels eternally indebted to the Saviour for giving him pensions and bonuses. He still measures a government's performance by how much money he hands out. He still awaits the Budget to calculate how much he is going to get. And he has managed to ingrain this philosophy even in his children.

That's why today we have 25 year olds who take our free education, open University, and free scholarships for granted. That's why we have 25 year olds who take the infinity of open opportunities which are today at our disposal for granted. And that's why we have 25 year olds who still think that "Gonzi has ruined our lives".

Take the water and electricity rates as a modern day example of this mentality. Labour promises that it would re-introduce subsidies. The "Laburist" claps in awe at his Leader's declaration, which means that his €100 bill will be reduced by, let's say, €10. He doesn't realize that this means that the €500 bill of the swimming-pool villa owner will be reduced by €50, and that these have to come from his taxes.

On the other hand, PN, whilst removing the subsidies, introduced a solar-heater grant scheme. Instead of subsidizing your bill, you are being given the opportunity to invest in a renewable energy product with the help of the state, which will practically reduce your bill by approximately 50% for years. The intelligent citizen, takes this opportunity to reduce his dependance on Enemalta rates and to reduce his dependance on the government's budget.

The traditional Labour support does not fathom that this is a measure in his favour. He prefers a one-time €400 cheque, rather than a one-time €400 investment which will benefit him in many years to come. Similarly, he would prefer a €7,000 cheque which he would spend in a few months, rather than a €7,000 scholarship which will benefit him for his whole life.

Mintoff created a generation which depended on government charity. He took away all the fishing rods and closed away the sea, so that he would be the only one distributing fish. That's why traditional Mintoffjani still attribute to him a god-like status. He dumbed a generation into believing that we should owe everything to politicians. And even today, behind the mask of a flashy new emblem and blue scenography, this squalid socialist mentality is still very much alive in the new generation of 'progressivi' and 'moderati'.

I believe differently. I was always taught to work hard so that you never have to depend on any politician's charity, but only on yourself. I am thankful for Eddie and successive Nationalist governments because instead of giving us fish, they gave us the fishing rods to let us catch as much as we want ourselves. I am thankful because today, the youngsters of my generation, can say that we are where we are and we can all achieve what we set our minds to, thanks only to ourselves and our parents' work. We do not need to feel indebted to any politician for what we achieve daily. We are indebted only to our hard work. That's why we only want a government that gives us good fishing rods and ensures a supply of fish in the sea, not a government that promises us fish without any clear policy on how to give us the freedom to go fishing ourselves.

In reality, this is the big "us and them" divide trickling through generations. There is only one way we can stop this bi-partisan mentality: through a proper and fair electoral reform. It's a real pity that Labour walked out of the committee working on such a Constitutional reform at the beginning of this legislature. A real pity. And I cannot for the life of me understand how they seem to back Franco Debono on such reforms, which need a two-third parliamentary majority, when they were the ones who walked out on them. That is where, in my opinion, Franco badly missed his target. The one who stopped these fundamental Constitutional and electoral reforms and party-financing laws, with which I whole-heartedly agree, was not Gonzi but Muscat. At least by yesterday's vote, he realized that handing us a Labour government was only going to guarantee that these reforms would stop from being discussed for a long time.

One last thing: please Dr. Muscat, spare us the "I'm the son of a working family" classist crap from your Prize Day speeches. We are all the sons of working families. And we are all workers. Mintoff's class envy should by now be dead.

Comments

  1. What this here fails to mention is the numerous times Joseph Muscat commends Eddie Fenech Adami and criticizes Mintoff's last years.
    What Mintoff created was a middle class which could fend for itself.Yes it did approach a welfare state and I'm glad past PN legislatures drove us away from that, but we did need it at the time because of the great income disparity between the social classes!
    When JM says he will reduce the W&E bills(which I myself am skeptical about) he means to criticize the inefficiency currently in the energy department.Choosing polluting heavy fuel old over diesel?!Is that the investment?Any money saved will be quickly lost again from the medical expenses to treat people at the hospital as well as EU fines.
    The fishing rods the labour party gave were the stipends they introduced, the free healthcare which wouldn't force a family to go into bankruptcy to treat an ailment, the free education to find a better job, the pensions;so people starting families didn't have to worry about their elders and much more.
    In 1997 Alfred Sant introduced a 50cent penalty to pick up free medicine from the clinics.This was intended to discourage people who didn't need the medicine from picking it up for nothing(heq jekk b'xejn!) The PN ran campaigns against him and quickly took the 50cent penalty away as they took to the podium(populist much?).Now hundreds of thousands are lost because the PN wanted to score a political point.
    When Alfred Sant increased W&E bills the PN ran campaigns against him when all he was doing was decrease the amount the government subsidized!Yet there again were the PN ready to score a political point and threaten strikes.
    In the budget before the 2008 election you seem to forget how the PN suddenly turned socialist by giving children's allowance to every family for every child(even families earning over Lm10,000)Is that investment? Yes it is I you only want to score political points.
    The government has increased the number of people it employs as opposed to decreased.This is from the same party who claim they "saved" Malta from socialism.
    Where I live every time a general election is looming I suddenly find workers filling the craters in my street for these last 20 years.Is that efficient?Now I would be incorrect if I do not point out the progress we have had in this sector thanks to EU funding.
    You have some good points here but try and be a little more balanced next time,the glow from my screen is overwhelmingly blue...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Stupid people like me have the guts to write what we believe because we live in a free democratic society where we do not need to fear expressing ourselves. I do not know where you have seen the mocking, but even if there is, parties and politicians are mocked all over the world. Is there something wrong with that? The country is not divided because stupid people like me speak the truth (or at least, what we believe is the truth), but because of a hate and division that was sowed by people in power. If you want to know who, listen to some of the speeches by Mintoff and KMB. You'd easily classify them as 'hate incitement'.

    By the way, thanks for being the first person to call me stupid.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ah the fishing rod... Very Dun Gorg Preca....
    Good analysis Mark

    ReplyDelete
  4. I like your line of thought, but it's a pity you did not continue on the same lines and include the PN's track record of the last 25 years as well. We are still living the 3rd decade under a PN regime. If you want to earn credibility you need to also break rank with the Nationalist party. As you said politics in Malta is the great divide. So start by taking action if you want things to change for a better future and help for this divide to narrow itself. It is us who need to act and do something about it. I am willing to. Are you?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Who's the real monster?

I usually hate comparisons, but some very different reactions from the 'great unthinking' rabble do merit some analysis. In May this year, the notorious dog Star was found buried alive . A prima facie , this looked liked the most horrific case of animal cruelty, and is still considered so by some. The perpetrator was described by the sensitive and caring animal-lovers as a villain, a heartless monster, deserving of death, stoning, or even to be 'buried alive in the same manner'. But what did Mr. Vella actually do, according to the testimony heard in Court? Star was sick. It was shedding fur, and quite old already, and its owner did not afford the treatment. In trying to save some money from paying for the dog to be put to sleep and killed properly by vets, she gave it to Mr. Vella to have it killed himself. Nothing much to make people angry till now. Mercy-killing of very sick and suffering animals is widely done and usually acceptable. You may

Shema Yisrael, the cries of the Palestinian people

You live a peaceful life in a modest home. You've never bothered anyone and you've never caused trouble. Out of the blues, a group of people claim that they should live in your house. Why? Because they have been persecuted in a war, and they claim that some 5,000 years ago, their God had told them your home was their promised land. Somehow, the whole community agrees with their wishes, and asks you to grant them your spare-bedroom. You oblige. After a few months, they take the whole top-floor. In a few year's time, they take over your kitchen. After a few more years, they own your house and keep you and your family locked in the bathroom. They don't even allow you to get out, while they strip-search you the few times they do. Even if it's a medical emergency. Sometimes not even medical personnel and ambulances are allowed to see to your needs while your children die in your hands. Desperation starts hitting you. Life seems to offer no hopes. In moments

Why I am dropping out of the Anti-ACTA protest

Like many avid internet users, I have followed with interest the debate about ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement). After reading numerous articles, watched sensational videos, and discussed ad nauseam with friends, I have realized that what I have come across is a campaign hi-jacked by lies, myths and misconceptions as to rival Malta's misinformed divorce referendum campaign. I have to say that the videos on Youtube   got me worried. I quickly signed the petition, joined the Anti-ACTA groups, and prepared myself for a full-blown fight against the big-governments who want to intrude on our privacy and freedom of expression. Like our MEP Edward Scicluna invited us to do in the University debate last Wednesday, I did not try to understand the details of ACTA but rather saw who the players behind it were. But as usual, my logical instincts took over, and his call to not try to understand ACTA actually pushed me to read the text. And here's what I now know: ACTA is