Skip to main content

Invest in education


Some of the ardent Labour supporters were yesterday proudly sharing on social media a photo of Muscat surrounded by youngsters beside a photo of Gonzi surrounded with somewhat older followers, the message being that Muscat is the new hope for our youths.

Let's leave to the side the obvious: that Muscat's Labour is based on media marketing and perceptions, rather than policies and decisions. We're on the brink of a general election and we still don't have a clue at how he is realistically going to keep his promises (though Labour's current enthusiasm for Hollande's victory might suggest how: he promised an increase in the highest bracket of taxation to 75%). And let's never mind that if it were for Muscat's anti-EU campaign, we wouldn't be able to dream half of the dreams and aspirations we have today.

The point is that I'd rather compare what the two leaders are actually saying than how they are posing for photographs. Here's an example -

Muscat: "A new Labour government could provide all young people with a guarantee they would be studying, training or in employment after they turned 16. Those who opted not to continue with their education had to be provided with better employment in which they could advance." (source)

Gonzi: "We urge everyone to invest in their education. Don’t wait for Muscat to train you but choose your subjects while studying and there will be jobs when you finish." (source)


If you're still in doubt which declaration is the most responsible, just choose which one you would rather say out-loud to your children

I am sure which one Joseph will say at home to his daughters, and it isn't the one he says on Sundays to his supporters.

The difference being that as a father, he doesn't want his daughters to grow-up completely dependent on him and unable to cope with life. But as a Labour politician, he wants his followers to depend on him and thank him for his generous providence and messianic arrival.

Just like Mintoff.


Comments

  1. UnknownMay 7, 2012 at 7:17 PM

    You should also mention what a shitty system we currently use at our schools here in Malta. Instead of trying to make fun of Dr Muscat take a look around and I am sure that you can write about other topics.Are you going to write something about the new power station using heavy fuel oil while damaging our health? I can also write another article based on a FAKE GOVERNMENT SCHEME which I had applied for and received an email saying that there is no funds available

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mark Anthony SammutMay 7, 2012 at 8:47 PM

    That's beside the point. If I had the time I'd write about every topic under the sun. One day I'll write about the other topics as well. In the meantime, why don't you write about them yourself? At this day and age, we're all free to do it.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I am dropping out of the Anti-ACTA protest

Like many avid internet users, I have followed with interest the debate about ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement). After reading numerous articles, watched sensational videos, and discussed ad nauseam with friends, I have realized that what I have come across is a campaign hi-jacked by lies, myths and misconceptions as to rival Malta's misinformed divorce referendum campaign. I have to say that the videos on Youtube   got me worried. I quickly signed the petition, joined the Anti-ACTA groups, and prepared myself for a full-blown fight against the big-governments who want to intrude on our privacy and freedom of expression. Like our MEP Edward Scicluna invited us to do in the University debate last Wednesday, I did not try to understand the details of ACTA but rather saw who the players behind it were. But as usual, my logical instincts took over, and his call to not try to understand ACTA actually pushed me to read the text. And here's what I now know: ACTA is ...
19 comments
Read more

Who's the real monster?

I usually hate comparisons, but some very different reactions from the 'great unthinking' rabble do merit some analysis. In May this year, the notorious dog Star was found buried alive . A prima facie , this looked liked the most horrific case of animal cruelty, and is still considered so by some. The perpetrator was described by the sensitive and caring animal-lovers as a villain, a heartless monster, deserving of death, stoning, or even to be 'buried alive in the same manner'. But what did Mr. Vella actually do, according to the testimony heard in Court? Star was sick. It was shedding fur, and quite old already, and its owner did not afford the treatment. In trying to save some money from paying for the dog to be put to sleep and killed properly by vets, she gave it to Mr. Vella to have it killed himself. Nothing much to make people angry till now. Mercy-killing of very sick and suffering animals is widely done and usually a...
17 comments
Read more

The Church and its riches

The above pictures has lately been doing rounds on facebook. Posted comments refer to injustice, hypocrisy, and of the Church not practising what it preaches. It seems it has become a common trend to blame the Church for everything under the sun. Hitting at the Church is the new way of looking cool. But before joining the bandwagon of shares, likes and comments, let me try to analyze the points this photo is trying to make. The first one: the Church is immensely rich. Well, it could be, but what do most of these riches constitute? Most of the Church's "riches" are fixed immovable assets, of which most are important human heritage. They can practically never be sold. Let's just say that the Pope sells all his adornments (provided anyone wants to buy them), maybe even Michelangelo's Pieta, and once we're at it , yes, maybe he should also sell the Sistine Chapel and have it converted to apartments. Then what? Apart from making UNESCO and the rest of human...
10 comments
Read more