Skip to main content

Invest in education


Some of the ardent Labour supporters were yesterday proudly sharing on social media a photo of Muscat surrounded by youngsters beside a photo of Gonzi surrounded with somewhat older followers, the message being that Muscat is the new hope for our youths.

Let's leave to the side the obvious: that Muscat's Labour is based on media marketing and perceptions, rather than policies and decisions. We're on the brink of a general election and we still don't have a clue at how he is realistically going to keep his promises (though Labour's current enthusiasm for Hollande's victory might suggest how: he promised an increase in the highest bracket of taxation to 75%). And let's never mind that if it were for Muscat's anti-EU campaign, we wouldn't be able to dream half of the dreams and aspirations we have today.

The point is that I'd rather compare what the two leaders are actually saying than how they are posing for photographs. Here's an example -

Muscat: "A new Labour government could provide all young people with a guarantee they would be studying, training or in employment after they turned 16. Those who opted not to continue with their education had to be provided with better employment in which they could advance." (source)

Gonzi: "We urge everyone to invest in their education. Don’t wait for Muscat to train you but choose your subjects while studying and there will be jobs when you finish." (source)


If you're still in doubt which declaration is the most responsible, just choose which one you would rather say out-loud to your children

I am sure which one Joseph will say at home to his daughters, and it isn't the one he says on Sundays to his supporters.

The difference being that as a father, he doesn't want his daughters to grow-up completely dependent on him and unable to cope with life. But as a Labour politician, he wants his followers to depend on him and thank him for his generous providence and messianic arrival.

Just like Mintoff.


Comments

  1. You should also mention what a shitty system we currently use at our schools here in Malta. Instead of trying to make fun of Dr Muscat take a look around and I am sure that you can write about other topics.Are you going to write something about the new power station using heavy fuel oil while damaging our health? I can also write another article based on a FAKE GOVERNMENT SCHEME which I had applied for and received an email saying that there is no funds available

    ReplyDelete
  2. That's beside the point. If I had the time I'd write about every topic under the sun. One day I'll write about the other topics as well. In the meantime, why don't you write about them yourself? At this day and age, we're all free to do it.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Elezzjoni għal Viċi Kap

Nemmen li l-Partit Nazzjonalista jeħtieġ Viċi-Kap li jkompli jsaħħaħ il-proċess ta' tiġdid li għaddej minnu l-Partit stess, biex ikun jista' jkompli jwettaq il-bidliet pożittivi f'pajjiżna. Għalhekk kien ta' pjaċir għalija li nhar is-Sibt li għadda kont wieħed minn tal-ewwel li iffirmajt in-nomina ta' Dr. Simon Busuttil għal din il-kariga tant importanti. Nawguralu minn qalbi.

Why I am dropping out of the Anti-ACTA protest

Like many avid internet users, I have followed with interest the debate about ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement). After reading numerous articles, watched sensational videos, and discussed ad nauseam with friends, I have realized that what I have come across is a campaign hi-jacked by lies, myths and misconceptions as to rival Malta's misinformed divorce referendum campaign. I have to say that the videos on Youtube   got me worried. I quickly signed the petition, joined the Anti-ACTA groups, and prepared myself for a full-blown fight against the big-governments who want to intrude on our privacy and freedom of expression. Like our MEP Edward Scicluna invited us to do in the University debate last Wednesday, I did not try to understand the details of ACTA but rather saw who the players behind it were. But as usual, my logical instincts took over, and his call to not try to understand ACTA actually pushed me to read the text. And here's what I now know: ACTA is ...

Who's the real monster?

I usually hate comparisons, but some very different reactions from the 'great unthinking' rabble do merit some analysis. In May this year, the notorious dog Star was found buried alive . A prima facie , this looked liked the most horrific case of animal cruelty, and is still considered so by some. The perpetrator was described by the sensitive and caring animal-lovers as a villain, a heartless monster, deserving of death, stoning, or even to be 'buried alive in the same manner'. But what did Mr. Vella actually do, according to the testimony heard in Court? Star was sick. It was shedding fur, and quite old already, and its owner did not afford the treatment. In trying to save some money from paying for the dog to be put to sleep and killed properly by vets, she gave it to Mr. Vella to have it killed himself. Nothing much to make people angry till now. Mercy-killing of very sick and suffering animals is widely done and usually a...