Skip to main content

Nothing personal, it's a vote for principles



Ministerial resignations in this country are few and far between. So it stands to reason that Mifsud Bonnici's resignation is no small matter. I think it's also the first time in Malta, at least as long as I can remember, that a Minister has been forced to resign by a parliamentary vote of no confidence.

One would therefore expect Mifsud Bonnici to have committed some grave sin. But what sort of wrong-doing has he been involved in? Mismanagement of public funds? Misleading Parliament? Corruption? Embezzlement? Nepotism?

Nay, none of the above. The reason it seems is that he should assume responsibility for problems existing in Malta's justice system for as long as I can remember, surely before his appointment to the post in 2008. Was he expected to solve all of them in four years, when the average court case currently takes three years to conclude?

Another accusation was that the Reparative Justice Act is being implemented too slowly. This act introduces parole, and allows prisoners to be able to slowly start spending time outside of prison to help in their re-integration into society. It's not something to rush in I'd say, and I would favour a staggered approach for its full implementation. But this accusation, coming from a criminal lawyer whose clients would be the first to benefit from it, sounds to be quite a conflicting case of interests to me.

Ah, before I forget, he's also to be held responsible because the courts don't have strong enough chairs for lawyers who think they should be able to kneel on chairs while addressing the court.

It seems that on a point of principle, for Labour and Franco Debono these accusation are enough to vote for the Minister's resignation. But wait...on a point of principle, or for some other reason?

Because it seems that the problems in the Justice Ministry would have been solved had Franco's package of demands been met. The problems in the justice sector would not have been so serious as to demand the Minister's resignation had Franco been made Leader of the House, deputy chairman of PN's think-thank AZAD (which is chaired by Simon Busuttil), had he been included in Lawrence Gonzi's and Simon Busuttil's meetings with civil society, and had the Prime Minister stopped bloggers from attacking him.

On a point of principle eh? Because he stands for justice, right?

And to assure us that it was nothing personal, after his act was complete he says to Carm: “Hekk. Biex tkun taf x’jigifieri taghmilli hsara mal-Prim Mhallef.” And to further re-assure us that it was not about him, he tells us that: "I hope that the sacrifice and difficult moments my family and I have been through will serve to establish meritocracy, where ministerial careers are open to talent and  political accountability." His talents of course.

Labour's point of principle is nonexistent, except that they quickly jumped on this personal revenge bandwagon. In comes Joseph Muscat talking about political accountability, when he is the Labour leader to have invited back candidates dismissed by Alfred Sant because of much more serious cases of corruption.

In come the old Labour crew who think that Carm's work in the Justice Ministry is a graver case than a judge who did not hear cases for seven whole years while retaining his full salary, paid by us. They, the same ones who voted for Carm's resignation, voted against this judge's impeachment when he refused to hear any more cases. But after all, one judge less doesn't add to the court's backlog, right?

And worst of all, in come the "progressives and moderates", showing off their dictatorial tendencies by expecting the Prime Minister to have the power to stop people from speaking their minds. While I disagree with some writings and comments, I do not expect anyone to have the power to shut anyone up, except in cases of lies and slander already covered by our libel laws. For me, this tendency in Labour is a far worse threat on democracy and freedom than all the imagined oligarchies put together.

I would like to thank Carm for his work and dedication. We all know who really stands for righteousness.

Comments

  1. my comment has nothing to do with the resignation, but just wanted to clarify a point you mentioned mr sammut:
    "This act introduces parole, and allows prisoners to be able to slowly start spending time outside of prison to help in their re-integration into society. It's not something to rush in I'd say"
    first of all..it has already taken four years - is this rushing for you? secondly..once the law has been enacted..YES one DOES expect things to be done and ready as now the prisoners have a right to it. thirdly, this act doesn't just enable prisoners to re-integrate into society, it encourages prisoners to follow a rehabilitation programme before being granted parole, which will help them to continue practicing the life they are taught during the rehabilitation programme. So YES i do believe that once this law has been enacted there IS a 'rush' for it to start functioning - we're talking about human beings

    ReplyDelete
  2. just a correction..i mentioned that this has been already going for 4 years, actually it has been going on since 2005..so really? rush??!!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Who's the real monster?

I usually hate comparisons, but some very different reactions from the 'great unthinking' rabble do merit some analysis. In May this year, the notorious dog Star was found buried alive . A prima facie , this looked liked the most horrific case of animal cruelty, and is still considered so by some. The perpetrator was described by the sensitive and caring animal-lovers as a villain, a heartless monster, deserving of death, stoning, or even to be 'buried alive in the same manner'. But what did Mr. Vella actually do, according to the testimony heard in Court? Star was sick. It was shedding fur, and quite old already, and its owner did not afford the treatment. In trying to save some money from paying for the dog to be put to sleep and killed properly by vets, she gave it to Mr. Vella to have it killed himself. Nothing much to make people angry till now. Mercy-killing of very sick and suffering animals is widely done and usually acceptable. You may

Shema Yisrael, the cries of the Palestinian people

You live a peaceful life in a modest home. You've never bothered anyone and you've never caused trouble. Out of the blues, a group of people claim that they should live in your house. Why? Because they have been persecuted in a war, and they claim that some 5,000 years ago, their God had told them your home was their promised land. Somehow, the whole community agrees with their wishes, and asks you to grant them your spare-bedroom. You oblige. After a few months, they take the whole top-floor. In a few year's time, they take over your kitchen. After a few more years, they own your house and keep you and your family locked in the bathroom. They don't even allow you to get out, while they strip-search you the few times they do. Even if it's a medical emergency. Sometimes not even medical personnel and ambulances are allowed to see to your needs while your children die in your hands. Desperation starts hitting you. Life seems to offer no hopes. In moments

Why I am dropping out of the Anti-ACTA protest

Like many avid internet users, I have followed with interest the debate about ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement). After reading numerous articles, watched sensational videos, and discussed ad nauseam with friends, I have realized that what I have come across is a campaign hi-jacked by lies, myths and misconceptions as to rival Malta's misinformed divorce referendum campaign. I have to say that the videos on Youtube   got me worried. I quickly signed the petition, joined the Anti-ACTA groups, and prepared myself for a full-blown fight against the big-governments who want to intrude on our privacy and freedom of expression. Like our MEP Edward Scicluna invited us to do in the University debate last Wednesday, I did not try to understand the details of ACTA but rather saw who the players behind it were. But as usual, my logical instincts took over, and his call to not try to understand ACTA actually pushed me to read the text. And here's what I now know: ACTA is