Skip to main content

Shocking reactions to a shocking death


The news that an immigrant died while under the custody of the Armed Forces of Malta is shocking, but what is more shocking is some people's reaction to it.

I will not delve into the circumstances of the death itself since that will be established by the the on-going inquiry and court case, though there is little I can imagine which might justify a hand-cuffed man being kicked and beaten to death.

But the reaction of an unfortunately large section of the population does merit our attention.

First of all, the simple fact that the accused are Maltese like us while the victim is not, does not justify a petition doing the rounds calling for their release. No, justice needs to take this course because a human life is a human life no matter its colour.

Secondly, how hard the soldiers have it with illegal immigrants, that the victim was a fugitive, and that the soldiers were during a day of work, does not justify the use of excessive violence in the least. And unfortunately, this is not the first time in recent years when accusations of the police or the army using excessive force have surfaced. Wearing a uniform does not give you a free rein to use violence with anyone you like (or rather, don't like).

This is a very important principle in a free democracy, because the next guy facing an accusation, maybe a false one, could be you. And you don't want to beaten, tortured or forced into a confession when you are not guilty. Unless you'd rather live in a police-state.

Having said that, the wrong-doings of a few members of our security forces should not mar the good and dedicated work done by the rest.

Thirdly, it is quite revealing that we witness outcries, protests and calls for the death penalty when a dog is killed, while we either stay silent or worse, come up with all sorts of justifications when the victim is a human being (see a previous related blog-post). It does quite show our distorted morals.

Lastly, I don't think now is the most responsible time for Dr. Joseph Muscat to appeal for the country to be strong on migration. I don't think now is the time for him to declare that he stands by his 2009 proposals, which included the suspension of our international obligations and letting people drown. On the contrary, at such a time, those populist declarations should be stinging his conscience.

Comments

  1. Manuel ManganiJuly 14, 2012 at 1:26 PM

    A very sensible piece.

    Tragic incidents like this one require as detached and emotion-free an approach as possible.
    http://manuelsmumblings.blogspot.com/2012/07/playing-judge-jury-executioner-and-god.html

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I am dropping out of the Anti-ACTA protest

Like many avid internet users, I have followed with interest the debate about ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement). After reading numerous articles, watched sensational videos, and discussed ad nauseam with friends, I have realized that what I have come across is a campaign hi-jacked by lies, myths and misconceptions as to rival Malta's misinformed divorce referendum campaign. I have to say that the videos on Youtube   got me worried. I quickly signed the petition, joined the Anti-ACTA groups, and prepared myself for a full-blown fight against the big-governments who want to intrude on our privacy and freedom of expression. Like our MEP Edward Scicluna invited us to do in the University debate last Wednesday, I did not try to understand the details of ACTA but rather saw who the players behind it were. But as usual, my logical instincts took over, and his call to not try to understand ACTA actually pushed me to read the text. And here's what I now know: ACTA is ...
19 comments
Read more

Who's the real monster?

I usually hate comparisons, but some very different reactions from the 'great unthinking' rabble do merit some analysis. In May this year, the notorious dog Star was found buried alive . A prima facie , this looked liked the most horrific case of animal cruelty, and is still considered so by some. The perpetrator was described by the sensitive and caring animal-lovers as a villain, a heartless monster, deserving of death, stoning, or even to be 'buried alive in the same manner'. But what did Mr. Vella actually do, according to the testimony heard in Court? Star was sick. It was shedding fur, and quite old already, and its owner did not afford the treatment. In trying to save some money from paying for the dog to be put to sleep and killed properly by vets, she gave it to Mr. Vella to have it killed himself. Nothing much to make people angry till now. Mercy-killing of very sick and suffering animals is widely done and usually a...
17 comments
Read more

The Church and its riches

The above pictures has lately been doing rounds on facebook. Posted comments refer to injustice, hypocrisy, and of the Church not practising what it preaches. It seems it has become a common trend to blame the Church for everything under the sun. Hitting at the Church is the new way of looking cool. But before joining the bandwagon of shares, likes and comments, let me try to analyze the points this photo is trying to make. The first one: the Church is immensely rich. Well, it could be, but what do most of these riches constitute? Most of the Church's "riches" are fixed immovable assets, of which most are important human heritage. They can practically never be sold. Let's just say that the Pope sells all his adornments (provided anyone wants to buy them), maybe even Michelangelo's Pieta, and once we're at it , yes, maybe he should also sell the Sistine Chapel and have it converted to apartments. Then what? Apart from making UNESCO and the rest of human...
10 comments
Read more