Skip to main content

Are the roads any safer?

This article was first published in the Times on 2nd August 2012



The third anniversary of the death of Cliff Micallef, a cycling enthusiast who was killed in a hit-and-run accident on the Coast Road while training for LifeCycle, fell last Monday.

Three years down the line from this tragic accident and I still wonder about what efforts have been made to render the roads safer for cyclists.

Only last week, a cyclist was injured after being hit by a bendy bus on the Coast Road. Three weeks ago, another cyclist suffered serious injuries after being hit by a car at St Paul’s Bay. Last April, a refugee cycling to work was seriously injured when he was hit by a car at Birżebbuġa. In the same month, another cyclist was injured after being hit by a car in Fgura. Two of these cases were a hit and run.

Dozens of similar accidents have been reported in these three years, many more are not even reported and near-misses are experienced frequently by all those who cycle regularly.

It is evident that there is general lack of respect towards cyclists and lack of awareness of what might endanger them. Being a cyclist myself and having been on the receiving end of a hit and run, which, luckily, had no serious consequences more than a year ago, I am troubled by an apparent lack of will to rectify the situation.

The benefits of cycling are obvious and I won’t repeat what is already common knowledge. As a mode of transport, cycling reduces traffic congestion and, thus, air pollution, while reducing our reliance on fossil fuels. Not to mention the health benefits that come with practising it regularly, which in the long run cuts the public health bill borne by the whole community.

On a positive note, many more people are taking up this sport, not only for leisure but also for commuting.
The temporary measure of refunding VAT paid on bicycle purchases was indeed a good incentive that should be continued on the principle that while polluters should pay more, non-polluters should pay less.

Unfortunately, the behaviour experienced on the road is still very sour, as cyclists are more commonly perceived as another inconvenience to put up with rather than positive contributors to be encouraged.

The first drive should be for more awareness. Drivers need to be more conscious of the fact that a cyclist has no metal frame surrounding him and no air bags to cushion his fall; he only has his flesh and bones and, therefore, deserves a higher degree of protection on the road than other vehicles.

Education and awareness though are never enough and need to be strengthened by legislation. Some European countries and American states have enacted laws to this effect, the basic of which being the “one-metre rule”, where drivers are required to keep a minimum distance of one metre when overtaking a cyclist. Cars are also not allowed to overtake cyclists close to bends and crossroads and cyclists are given priority at crossings.

Another hazard is found in the now common practice of double-parking cars while the unconcerned driver runs a quick errand. The danger is not only for cyclists but also for other cars users who, to overtake, sometimes even have to drive wrong way, a practice which both the police and wardens seem oblivious to, while they keep preferring to fine softer targets whose offence would be causing much less danger.

A stronger police presence on the roads is sorely needed because careless driving is unfortunately on the rise and endangering everyone, not only cyclists. The law must come down hard on those who endanger other people’s lives, both by driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol or simply by reckless behaviour.

It must also come down harder on those who try to run away from their responsibility when they err. In such cases, suspended sentences are not enough; long bans from the road and heavy fines should be in order. After all, very few things are worse than injuring a human being and leaving him/her lying by the side of the road as if s/he were some unwanted piece of garbage.

The reality is that while more cycling lanes would be welcome, it is impossible to have them covering all the roads in the whole country. Different commuters must, therefore, learn to co-exist and share the roads between them. Mutual respect will go a long way in achieving that. Stronger legislation and enforcement would definitely speed up the process.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who's the real monster?

I usually hate comparisons, but some very different reactions from the 'great unthinking' rabble do merit some analysis. In May this year, the notorious dog Star was found buried alive . A prima facie , this looked liked the most horrific case of animal cruelty, and is still considered so by some. The perpetrator was described by the sensitive and caring animal-lovers as a villain, a heartless monster, deserving of death, stoning, or even to be 'buried alive in the same manner'. But what did Mr. Vella actually do, according to the testimony heard in Court? Star was sick. It was shedding fur, and quite old already, and its owner did not afford the treatment. In trying to save some money from paying for the dog to be put to sleep and killed properly by vets, she gave it to Mr. Vella to have it killed himself. Nothing much to make people angry till now. Mercy-killing of very sick and suffering animals is widely done and usually acceptable. You may

Shema Yisrael, the cries of the Palestinian people

You live a peaceful life in a modest home. You've never bothered anyone and you've never caused trouble. Out of the blues, a group of people claim that they should live in your house. Why? Because they have been persecuted in a war, and they claim that some 5,000 years ago, their God had told them your home was their promised land. Somehow, the whole community agrees with their wishes, and asks you to grant them your spare-bedroom. You oblige. After a few months, they take the whole top-floor. In a few year's time, they take over your kitchen. After a few more years, they own your house and keep you and your family locked in the bathroom. They don't even allow you to get out, while they strip-search you the few times they do. Even if it's a medical emergency. Sometimes not even medical personnel and ambulances are allowed to see to your needs while your children die in your hands. Desperation starts hitting you. Life seems to offer no hopes. In moments

Why I am dropping out of the Anti-ACTA protest

Like many avid internet users, I have followed with interest the debate about ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement). After reading numerous articles, watched sensational videos, and discussed ad nauseam with friends, I have realized that what I have come across is a campaign hi-jacked by lies, myths and misconceptions as to rival Malta's misinformed divorce referendum campaign. I have to say that the videos on Youtube   got me worried. I quickly signed the petition, joined the Anti-ACTA groups, and prepared myself for a full-blown fight against the big-governments who want to intrude on our privacy and freedom of expression. Like our MEP Edward Scicluna invited us to do in the University debate last Wednesday, I did not try to understand the details of ACTA but rather saw who the players behind it were. But as usual, my logical instincts took over, and his call to not try to understand ACTA actually pushed me to read the text. And here's what I now know: ACTA is