Skip to main content

Should school uniforms go?


A suggestion by the MUT in its pre-election document for political parties to consider abolishing school uniforms has sparked quite a discussion on the online media, especially on timesofmalta.com.

At the beginning of this scholastic year, school uniforms were already on the agenda, and the parliamentary Social Affairs committee issued its recommendations in February this year, basically recommending simplicity and less frequent changes in uniform design, and no exclusive contracts with one supplier. The Education Ministry had agreed with these proposals and said that most of them were already being implemented.

I am of the opinion that uniforms should stay. First of all, the argument that uniforms are expensive and removing them would ease the expenses off parents' pockets does not hold water. On the contrary, kids would require more clothes, apart from the competitive element of what clothes to wear, risking a higher element of bullying on kids coming from poorer families especially in secondary school. A uniform also provides a more visible sense of equal footing, where a student is assessed in class only on his academic abilities, in the pitch on his physical and athletic abilities, in the art-room on his creativity, in the hall on his performing ability...and never on his attire.

Uniforms also give students a sense of belonging to the school they are attending, and make it more difficult for them to venture outside school-grounds, as the uniform would be easily identifiable.

Uniforms therefore make life easier for parents, educators, and students. If the only difficulty is their price, it can be solved with the most obvious solution which keeps prices down: free up the market, remove exclusivity and monopolies, and increase competition. Thankfully, that's what the Social Affairs committee is proposing and that's what state schools have started to implement.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Elezzjoni għal Viċi Kap

Nemmen li l-Partit Nazzjonalista jeħtieġ Viċi-Kap li jkompli jsaħħaħ il-proċess ta' tiġdid li għaddej minnu l-Partit stess, biex ikun jista' jkompli jwettaq il-bidliet pożittivi f'pajjiżna. Għalhekk kien ta' pjaċir għalija li nhar is-Sibt li għadda kont wieħed minn tal-ewwel li iffirmajt in-nomina ta' Dr. Simon Busuttil għal din il-kariga tant importanti. Nawguralu minn qalbi.

Who's the real monster?

I usually hate comparisons, but some very different reactions from the 'great unthinking' rabble do merit some analysis. In May this year, the notorious dog Star was found buried alive . A prima facie , this looked liked the most horrific case of animal cruelty, and is still considered so by some. The perpetrator was described by the sensitive and caring animal-lovers as a villain, a heartless monster, deserving of death, stoning, or even to be 'buried alive in the same manner'. But what did Mr. Vella actually do, according to the testimony heard in Court? Star was sick. It was shedding fur, and quite old already, and its owner did not afford the treatment. In trying to save some money from paying for the dog to be put to sleep and killed properly by vets, she gave it to Mr. Vella to have it killed himself. Nothing much to make people angry till now. Mercy-killing of very sick and suffering animals is widely done and usually a...

Why I am dropping out of the Anti-ACTA protest

Like many avid internet users, I have followed with interest the debate about ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement). After reading numerous articles, watched sensational videos, and discussed ad nauseam with friends, I have realized that what I have come across is a campaign hi-jacked by lies, myths and misconceptions as to rival Malta's misinformed divorce referendum campaign. I have to say that the videos on Youtube   got me worried. I quickly signed the petition, joined the Anti-ACTA groups, and prepared myself for a full-blown fight against the big-governments who want to intrude on our privacy and freedom of expression. Like our MEP Edward Scicluna invited us to do in the University debate last Wednesday, I did not try to understand the details of ACTA but rather saw who the players behind it were. But as usual, my logical instincts took over, and his call to not try to understand ACTA actually pushed me to read the text. And here's what I now know: ACTA is ...