Skip to main content

Of lobbying and influence


Whilst refraining from passing judgement about the Dalli saga which is being investigated by the Advocate General after OLAF's findings, whatever the outcome the fact remains that we, as a Nation, have been brought to shame. Suffice to say that this is the first time an EU Commissioner is resigning on his own because of allegations of wrong-doing. One cannot but feel saddened by hearing Malta's name being associated with such dealings. Irrelevant of the fact whether Dalli acted illegally or not, he is deemed to have acted unethically and his position has become untenable. It is normal practice for politicians under investigation to resign from their posts. Justifying behaviour with the wrong Maltese culture that "it's the usual political game in Malta...having friends who need something", is even more denigrating for our country, especially coming from a seasoned politician. The fact that no law might have been broken does not mean the behaviour was correct, ethical and serious. Calls for Parliament to debate this state of affairs before the Attorney General finishes his investigations are completely irresponsible, as are outright condemnations and blind-folded justifications. Trials by media rarely lead to a just assessment, as a recent case clearly showed. We should let justice take its course.

This case has certainly brought back up for discussion the issue of lobbying within the EU. Lobbying is the way in which organizations and stakeholders attempt to influence decision-making bodies, mainly legislators and regulatory agencies. Some hold lobbying in a bad light, some say it is necessary for everyone's voice to be heard.

I think lobbying puts politicians and policy-makers on very treacherous ground. No matter how many transparency regulations are adopted (and various calls have been made for the EU to tighten its lobbying rules), facts are that the access to lobbying, and thus to influence policy-making, is becoming dependent on the lobby's financial means.

That's why I believe that too much centralized power, too much big government, always ends up favouring big business at the detriment of the ordinary citizens and smaller enterprises. Not necessarily in exchange for money, but maybe in exchange of praise, influence or political campaign financing. It happens in the United States Congress (case in point is the repeated extension to Copyright terms which go contrary to the spirit of the US Constitution and which have harshly limited free innovation and creativity in the past century), and it is happening in the EU with the increase of centralized power shifting towards Brussels.

The EU we joined was a union of free trade, co-operation, and sharing of resources. It wasn't a union of harmonized taxation rules, a million directives, and certainly not a Federal one. It needs to be careful as to where it is going, and we need to be careful as to how much of our sovereignty it makes sense for us to cede.

I wish to take this opportunity to augur Dr. Tonio Borg for his nomination to be the new Maltese EU Commissioner. I am sure that with his integrity and honesty he can do a great job in restoring Malta's good name and reputation.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who's the real monster?

I usually hate comparisons, but some very different reactions from the 'great unthinking' rabble do merit some analysis. In May this year, the notorious dog Star was found buried alive . A prima facie , this looked liked the most horrific case of animal cruelty, and is still considered so by some. The perpetrator was described by the sensitive and caring animal-lovers as a villain, a heartless monster, deserving of death, stoning, or even to be 'buried alive in the same manner'. But what did Mr. Vella actually do, according to the testimony heard in Court? Star was sick. It was shedding fur, and quite old already, and its owner did not afford the treatment. In trying to save some money from paying for the dog to be put to sleep and killed properly by vets, she gave it to Mr. Vella to have it killed himself. Nothing much to make people angry till now. Mercy-killing of very sick and suffering animals is widely done and usually acceptable. You may

Shema Yisrael, the cries of the Palestinian people

You live a peaceful life in a modest home. You've never bothered anyone and you've never caused trouble. Out of the blues, a group of people claim that they should live in your house. Why? Because they have been persecuted in a war, and they claim that some 5,000 years ago, their God had told them your home was their promised land. Somehow, the whole community agrees with their wishes, and asks you to grant them your spare-bedroom. You oblige. After a few months, they take the whole top-floor. In a few year's time, they take over your kitchen. After a few more years, they own your house and keep you and your family locked in the bathroom. They don't even allow you to get out, while they strip-search you the few times they do. Even if it's a medical emergency. Sometimes not even medical personnel and ambulances are allowed to see to your needs while your children die in your hands. Desperation starts hitting you. Life seems to offer no hopes. In moments

Why I am dropping out of the Anti-ACTA protest

Like many avid internet users, I have followed with interest the debate about ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement). After reading numerous articles, watched sensational videos, and discussed ad nauseam with friends, I have realized that what I have come across is a campaign hi-jacked by lies, myths and misconceptions as to rival Malta's misinformed divorce referendum campaign. I have to say that the videos on Youtube   got me worried. I quickly signed the petition, joined the Anti-ACTA groups, and prepared myself for a full-blown fight against the big-governments who want to intrude on our privacy and freedom of expression. Like our MEP Edward Scicluna invited us to do in the University debate last Wednesday, I did not try to understand the details of ACTA but rather saw who the players behind it were. But as usual, my logical instincts took over, and his call to not try to understand ACTA actually pushed me to read the text. And here's what I now know: ACTA is