My memory of Fr Rene

I got to know Rene back before he ordained as a priest, when we both attended vocational live-ins at the Seminary. His permanent smile and optimism always characterized him, and his words of courage to those going through difficult times, and even when his own father tragically died, will remain a shining example of strength and empathy.

We worked together again during his one-year experience at our parish in Gudja, during his diaconate, where he was very present in our youth groups.

He was in Gudja again just a year ago for the JChallenge activity, an activity where we brought together different youth and voluntary groups from across the country to celebrate voluntary work. He gave his input, guided us with his ideas, and celebrated mass with us during the event.

I still remember him, during that event, asking if I was contesting the elections. I remember telling him that no, it wasn't on my mind and I didn't have time for it. He encouraged me to.

Eight months later I was asked to do it, and I ended up saying 'yes'.

When he started serving his pastoral duties in Zejtun, we often ended up going to his Sunday evening youth mass. Just a few weeks ago we met there again, he wished me luck, and with his usual smile, reminded me how he had been right.

Yesterday we had decided that today we'd go for his usual mass. This morning the news of his departure hit us like lightning. But we still went, knowing that he wouldn't be there.

We went, we didn't see him, but he was there.

He was there in the enthusiasm and energy with which he had transmitted his experience and love of Christ to those who knew him, and which we'll carry in our hearts forever.

He was there in the fruits of the pastoral work he was doing in his parish and in the pastoral work he did away from our shores.

And he will be there when one day we will get to meet again.

Till then Fr Rene, farewell.

Condolences to his relatives and family, may they find comfort in the knowledge that the good he did in his life will echo in eternity.

Comments

Why I am dropping out of the Anti-ACTA protest

Like many avid internet users, I have followed with interest the debate about ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement). After reading numerous articles, watched sensational videos, and discussed ad nauseam with friends, I have realized that what I have come across is a campaign hi-jacked by lies, myths and misconceptions as to rival Malta's misinformed divorce referendum campaign. I have to say that the videos on Youtube got me worried. I quickly signed the petition, joined the Anti-ACTA groups, and prepared myself for a full-blown fight against the big-governments who want to intrude on our privacy and freedom of expression. Like our MEP Edward Scicluna invited us to do in the University debate last Wednesday, I did not try to understand the details of ACTA but rather saw who the players behind it were. But as usual, my logical instincts took over, and his call to not try to understand ACTA actually pushed me to read the text. And here's what I now know: ACTA is ...

Who's the real monster?

I usually hate comparisons, but some very different reactions from the 'great unthinking' rabble do merit some analysis. In May this year, the notorious dog Star was found buried alive . A prima facie , this looked liked the most horrific case of animal cruelty, and is still considered so by some. The perpetrator was described by the sensitive and caring animal-lovers as a villain, a heartless monster, deserving of death, stoning, or even to be 'buried alive in the same manner'. But what did Mr. Vella actually do, according to the testimony heard in Court? Star was sick. It was shedding fur, and quite old already, and its owner did not afford the treatment. In trying to save some money from paying for the dog to be put to sleep and killed properly by vets, she gave it to Mr. Vella to have it killed himself. Nothing much to make people angry till now. Mercy-killing of very sick and suffering animals is widely done and usually a...

The Church and its riches

The above pictures has lately been doing rounds on facebook. Posted comments refer to injustice, hypocrisy, and of the Church not practising what it preaches. It seems it has become a common trend to blame the Church for everything under the sun. Hitting at the Church is the new way of looking cool. But before joining the bandwagon of shares, likes and comments, let me try to analyze the points this photo is trying to make. The first one: the Church is immensely rich. Well, it could be, but what do most of these riches constitute? Most of the Church's "riches" are fixed immovable assets, of which most are important human heritage. They can practically never be sold. Let's just say that the Pope sells all his adornments (provided anyone wants to buy them), maybe even Michelangelo's Pieta, and once we're at it , yes, maybe he should also sell the Sistine Chapel and have it converted to apartments. Then what? Apart from making UNESCO and the rest of human...

Mark Anthony Sammut

Search This Blog