Skip to main content

Water - a national resource

This article was published in The Malta Independent on Sunday on the 16th December 2012



Water is the primary source of life on earth. Cities and dwellings have been built around rivers or according to according to the availability of a source of water. Despite the fact that this barren rock does not have rivers or lakes, it is what it is today because spring water sustained its population throughout the centuries, supplemented with this population’s intelligence in harvesting rainwater. Cisterns, dams, reservoirs, aqueducts, you name it – we built it!

Technological advancements and the development of reverse-osmosis plants have led us to believe that our water supply is infinite, leading us to neglect our natural source of water: our aquifers. Not only that, but we have left unenforced a law set up since the time of the Knights, that of building a cistern with every building to store rainwater at source, reducing demand and also alleviating flooding.

A further issue has compounded this problem in recent years: the increase of intensively irrigated agriculture which has increased water demand exponentially, from 19 million m3 in 2008 to 28 million m3 in 2010. Moreover, the intensive use of fertilizers since the 1970s has led to an increase in nitrate levels which exceed EU directives.

At the same time, private individuals have illegally drilled boreholes for non-agricultural purposes, immorally financing their private enjoyment of swimming pools or other lavishes at the expense of a public resource like groundwater. Given that groundwater is a finite resource, every drop pumped out by these private sources is a drop taken from a resource, which would have otherwise been used by the local Water Services Corporation to keep water tariffs affordable. In essence, the law-abiding citizen who didn’t drill a borehole is paying for the abuse by others through higher water bills. 


90% of Malta’s aquifers fail to meet ‘good status’ as required by the EU Water Framework Directive. Over-pumping has resulted in a general salinization of groundwater, with the result that the Water Services Corporation is steadily reducing its groundwater production due to deterioration in quality. Moreover, some farmers have had to invest in their own RO plants to remove salt from their groundwater sources to make the water suitable for irrigation.

A recent study has shown that water from valleys and rural areas of high farming and animal husbandry activity has nitrate concentrations that are six times the acceptable drinking water level. This high-nitrate water is slowly infiltrating the bedrock to reach the aquifer and continue to make an already bad situation worse.  

Positive steps have been taken. Last year MRA closed a number of illegal boreholes in private homes, though many still remain and need to be tackled.


A borehole metering programme on registered boreholes has started and is due to be completed in 2013.  

In the last 4 years, the PN government has invested in excess of Euro 100 million to treat all the country’s sewage, thus ensuring that we have among the cleanest seas in the Mediterranean. Moreover, it has committed itself to invest in ‘polishing’ the treated effluent from the sewage treatment plants to recover water for agriculture.

The National Flood Relief Project includes a Euro 1 million soak-away to help re-charge the aquifer with urban stormwater, which is an inexpensive source of low-nitrate water.

It is evident that more needs to be done to safeguard our aquifer, as we cannot allow ourselves to become completely dependent on the RO plants, without means of redress in the event of a natural disaster like an oil-spill or sabotage.

Agriculture is the largest consumer of water in Malta today. Any significant improvement in the water situation in Malta has to inevitably address the way this sector uses water. Moreover, it is in the sector’s own interest to ensure that the aquifers continue to yield water for irrigation. In this context I believe that any agricultural policy that takes into consideration Malta’s water limitations needs to be drawn up. The sector must discuss the adoption of a ‘most-crop-per-drop’ policy. This should be coupled with reducing the use of nitrates from fertilizers, something which the Nitrate Action Programme starts to tackle.

It is essential to close down all illegal boreholes, stop the drilling of new ones, and monitor the use of registered ones. Farmers should be provided with alternative sources of water, such as polished sewage effluent and further incentives to invest in rainwater harvesting.   

It is essential to enforce the age-old legislation of building a cistern for every building

It is essential to find ways on how we can increase groundwater recharge with water of suitable quality, without risk to the same aquifers and to public health. The country should assess the possibility of building more soak-aways as that built as part of the National Flood Relief project and restore existing ones.

I feel duty-bound to speak on this matter because future generations depend on it. And I don't want future generations to point their fingers at us for staying silent and for not taking the necessary actions.

Moreover, I feel duty-bound to speak when the alternative is a Labour Party which has no policy on this issue. I feel duty-bound to speak when Muscat seems to not even acknowledge the existence of this problem. I feel duty-bound to speak when Muscat, caught in his wave of promising everything to everyone, went as far as to say that the current process of metering and monitoring of private boreholes is not even required. I feel duty-bound to speak when Muscat promises to reduce utility tariffs when he has no policy on tackling the cost of water production.

As a candidate for the Nationalist Party, I urge my party to continue to build on the positive steps taken, and to give particular importance to water sustainability in its upcoming electoral manifesto.

For the survival of agriculture. For the survival of the aquifer. For a sustainable future for our children.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who's the real monster?

I usually hate comparisons, but some very different reactions from the 'great unthinking' rabble do merit some analysis. In May this year, the notorious dog Star was found buried alive . A prima facie , this looked liked the most horrific case of animal cruelty, and is still considered so by some. The perpetrator was described by the sensitive and caring animal-lovers as a villain, a heartless monster, deserving of death, stoning, or even to be 'buried alive in the same manner'. But what did Mr. Vella actually do, according to the testimony heard in Court? Star was sick. It was shedding fur, and quite old already, and its owner did not afford the treatment. In trying to save some money from paying for the dog to be put to sleep and killed properly by vets, she gave it to Mr. Vella to have it killed himself. Nothing much to make people angry till now. Mercy-killing of very sick and suffering animals is widely done and usually acceptable. You may

Shema Yisrael, the cries of the Palestinian people

You live a peaceful life in a modest home. You've never bothered anyone and you've never caused trouble. Out of the blues, a group of people claim that they should live in your house. Why? Because they have been persecuted in a war, and they claim that some 5,000 years ago, their God had told them your home was their promised land. Somehow, the whole community agrees with their wishes, and asks you to grant them your spare-bedroom. You oblige. After a few months, they take the whole top-floor. In a few year's time, they take over your kitchen. After a few more years, they own your house and keep you and your family locked in the bathroom. They don't even allow you to get out, while they strip-search you the few times they do. Even if it's a medical emergency. Sometimes not even medical personnel and ambulances are allowed to see to your needs while your children die in your hands. Desperation starts hitting you. Life seems to offer no hopes. In moments

Why I am dropping out of the Anti-ACTA protest

Like many avid internet users, I have followed with interest the debate about ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement). After reading numerous articles, watched sensational videos, and discussed ad nauseam with friends, I have realized that what I have come across is a campaign hi-jacked by lies, myths and misconceptions as to rival Malta's misinformed divorce referendum campaign. I have to say that the videos on Youtube   got me worried. I quickly signed the petition, joined the Anti-ACTA groups, and prepared myself for a full-blown fight against the big-governments who want to intrude on our privacy and freedom of expression. Like our MEP Edward Scicluna invited us to do in the University debate last Wednesday, I did not try to understand the details of ACTA but rather saw who the players behind it were. But as usual, my logical instincts took over, and his call to not try to understand ACTA actually pushed me to read the text. And here's what I now know: ACTA is