Skip to main content

Night Tariffs: when Europe's norm is Labour's joke


The Nationalist Party is proposing that with the commissioning of the inter-connector with Sicily (a submarine cable through which Malta would be able to buy electricity from the European grid and which will allow Malta to close down the Marsa power-station), coupled with finishing the installation of smart meters by this year's end, night tariffs for electricity will be introduced in March 2014.

This will be possible because European countries have a surplus of electricity generation during the night, which they are eager to sell at very low prices.

There is also another long-term benefit in introducing night-tariffs. It gives an incentive to both industry and domestic users to run certain electricity-consuming processes during the night, whenever possible. This balances the load difference between day and night, and reduces the peak demand for electricity. In simple words, if certain processes instead of being run during the day are run at night, demand during the day goes down. This means that further investment to increase electricity generation may be postponed while allowing for economic growth.

In fact, even Joseph Muscat agreed with this (at least, until Konrad Mizzi came up with the proposal which has disappeared from their manifesto and which they are already trying to make us forget). Here's what he said in Parliament in 2008 (and again in 2011):

"Dr Muscat proposed the introduction of a cheaper night rate for electricity in a bid to equalize demand throughout the day since this increased power station efficiency and reduced waste.
With such a rate, families would be encouraged to use certain appliances on timer during the night instead of during the day. The same system could be introduced at least for part of industry and for businesses. Similarly, the Water Services Corporation should start operating at night those reverse osmosis plants which were not in residential areas. Water production used a lot of energy and such a measure would increase efficiency at the power stations."
- The Times, 11 November 2008


Quite surprisingly, Joseph Muscat during this campaign has chosen to ridicule the night tariffs, which he himself had supported, and his supporters have blindly followed cue. Apart from being another convenient U-turn to add to his list of mistakes, it is quite ironic that the party which is trying to portray itself as 'more' moderate, progressive and European, is ridiculing what is the norm across the European continent and what is backed up by scientific reasons.

But maybe, it should be expected. For Labour, winning an election seems to be just a game of colours and slogans and not of beliefs.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Elezzjoni għal Viċi Kap

Nemmen li l-Partit Nazzjonalista jeħtieġ Viċi-Kap li jkompli jsaħħaħ il-proċess ta' tiġdid li għaddej minnu l-Partit stess, biex ikun jista' jkompli jwettaq il-bidliet pożittivi f'pajjiżna. Għalhekk kien ta' pjaċir għalija li nhar is-Sibt li għadda kont wieħed minn tal-ewwel li iffirmajt in-nomina ta' Dr. Simon Busuttil għal din il-kariga tant importanti. Nawguralu minn qalbi.

Why I am dropping out of the Anti-ACTA protest

Like many avid internet users, I have followed with interest the debate about ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement). After reading numerous articles, watched sensational videos, and discussed ad nauseam with friends, I have realized that what I have come across is a campaign hi-jacked by lies, myths and misconceptions as to rival Malta's misinformed divorce referendum campaign. I have to say that the videos on Youtube   got me worried. I quickly signed the petition, joined the Anti-ACTA groups, and prepared myself for a full-blown fight against the big-governments who want to intrude on our privacy and freedom of expression. Like our MEP Edward Scicluna invited us to do in the University debate last Wednesday, I did not try to understand the details of ACTA but rather saw who the players behind it were. But as usual, my logical instincts took over, and his call to not try to understand ACTA actually pushed me to read the text. And here's what I now know: ACTA is ...

Who's the real monster?

I usually hate comparisons, but some very different reactions from the 'great unthinking' rabble do merit some analysis. In May this year, the notorious dog Star was found buried alive . A prima facie , this looked liked the most horrific case of animal cruelty, and is still considered so by some. The perpetrator was described by the sensitive and caring animal-lovers as a villain, a heartless monster, deserving of death, stoning, or even to be 'buried alive in the same manner'. But what did Mr. Vella actually do, according to the testimony heard in Court? Star was sick. It was shedding fur, and quite old already, and its owner did not afford the treatment. In trying to save some money from paying for the dog to be put to sleep and killed properly by vets, she gave it to Mr. Vella to have it killed himself. Nothing much to make people angry till now. Mercy-killing of very sick and suffering animals is widely done and usually a...