Skip to main content

100 days – good, bad and the ugly

Article by Christian Peregin in the Sunday Times of Malta, 18 June 2013




Three months have passed since Labour was elected to power after a long period in opposition.Christian Peregin speaks to analysts to see what they are making of the situation.
If you thought a change in Government would bring the economy to a halt and spark street violence, the past 100 days have proven you wrong.
But if you thought Labour was so well-prepared for Government that it would change the country overnight, you were also sorely mistaken.
“It reminds me of an infant starting to walk,” says former editor of The Sunday Times of Malta Laurence Grech.
“They will tumble, fall, and commit mistakes but eventually I hope they will find their feet. The fact they have been out of power for almost 25 years has a bearing on this,” he says.
The Government has certainly given a fresh push to some sectors that were neglected by the previous administration.
Transgender people have been given the right to marry – a move that prompted the Nationalist Party to apologise to people like Joanne Cassar who were insensitively treated by the last Government. Meanwhile, civil unions are in the pipeline, with a Consultative Council already drawing up a law.
Developers are also ecstatic over the reduction in planning fees and the revised Global Residence Scheme that is expected to boost the industry. The Government’s energy plan is also moving rapidly, with 11 bidders already shortlisted for the project.
“Another good point has been the series of meetings with the public being conducted by ministers,” adds Mr Grech, recalling similar initiatives by Nationalist administrations.
However, there has also been a chorus of disapproval over many of the initial decisions taken by the Government – primarily the appointments given to PN dissenters and people who helped the party, as Mr Grech points out.
“People in top positions should be ideologically close to the Government, but I also believe in meritocracy,” says former Alternattiva Demokratika chairman Michael Briguglio.
He says there have been “many mistakes” on this level, especially in the cultural sector.
Although he is happy with some of the educational reforms under way, Dr Briguglio is not impressed by the “field day” being given to big developers, some of whom have even been seen sitting at press conference tables with ministers.
“I would say Malta Tagħna Lkoll was a problematic slogan. In politics, you always have to take a stand and you always have adversaries,” he says.
Former PN candidate Mark Anthony Sammut says one of the Government’s best moves so far was the push given to reforming the justice system.
However, he thinks the “blatant” rewards being given to people who helped the Labour Party, as well as the seeming disregard of the Code of Ethics for ministers and parliamentary secretaries, have soured the Government’s performance immensely.
“If one of these things happened under the previous Nationalist Government, it would have been massacred,” he says.
He was also disappointed by the removal of most permanent secretaries who are not mean to be sacked with a change in Government.
Mr Sammut believes the Government was strategic in its actions, knowing most of its initial decisions would be long forgotten by the next election.
“The problem is that they have now instilled a culture of payback,” he says.
Political observer Godfrey Grima – who had endorsed Joseph Muscat for Labour leadership – is much happier with the Government’s performance, though he says it is still too early to judge.
He says there have been “hiccups”, such as the controversy surrounding Parliamentary Secretary Franco Mercieca’s waiver from the Code of Ethics and the transfers seen at St Vincent De Paul.
“But I think they were misunderstandings,” he says.
He believes the Government had shown itself to be “cautious” as well as hardworking.
“We have a Prime Minister with a good sense of balance,” he says, downplaying the controversial appointments by highlighting the varied board members chosen for Air Malta.
On the contrary, he says, Dr Muscat is instilling a sense of national unity and is not out for his pound of flesh.
Carmen Sammut, the chairwoman of Labour’s think-tank Ideat, believes the Government is still in its honeymoon period.
While some ministers who had a bit of experience or technical preparation were able to hit the ground running, others suffered.
“There is an element of inexperience. After a quarter of a century, there is now a new generation of people in Cabinet and working around them. I think some of the mistakes can be attributed to this, and hopefully the glitches will be ironed out in the coming months and years.”
She said the case of Mr Mercieca was badly handled, and before that there was the case of Godfrey Farrugia appointing his partner Marlene Farrugia to help him at the Health Ministry.
On the plus side, she is positive about the appointments made at the State broadcaster, PBS, as well as the new thrust given to civil liberties.
She says the Government will find it difficult to please all Labour supporters who had very high expectations but has probably managed to relieve PN supporters since all the pre-electoral scaremongering did not amount to much.
“The moderate majority that is still assessing the situation and will decide when the honeymoon period is over,” she says.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who's the real monster?

I usually hate comparisons, but some very different reactions from the 'great unthinking' rabble do merit some analysis. In May this year, the notorious dog Star was found buried alive . A prima facie , this looked liked the most horrific case of animal cruelty, and is still considered so by some. The perpetrator was described by the sensitive and caring animal-lovers as a villain, a heartless monster, deserving of death, stoning, or even to be 'buried alive in the same manner'. But what did Mr. Vella actually do, according to the testimony heard in Court? Star was sick. It was shedding fur, and quite old already, and its owner did not afford the treatment. In trying to save some money from paying for the dog to be put to sleep and killed properly by vets, she gave it to Mr. Vella to have it killed himself. Nothing much to make people angry till now. Mercy-killing of very sick and suffering animals is widely done and usually acceptable. You may

Shema Yisrael, the cries of the Palestinian people

You live a peaceful life in a modest home. You've never bothered anyone and you've never caused trouble. Out of the blues, a group of people claim that they should live in your house. Why? Because they have been persecuted in a war, and they claim that some 5,000 years ago, their God had told them your home was their promised land. Somehow, the whole community agrees with their wishes, and asks you to grant them your spare-bedroom. You oblige. After a few months, they take the whole top-floor. In a few year's time, they take over your kitchen. After a few more years, they own your house and keep you and your family locked in the bathroom. They don't even allow you to get out, while they strip-search you the few times they do. Even if it's a medical emergency. Sometimes not even medical personnel and ambulances are allowed to see to your needs while your children die in your hands. Desperation starts hitting you. Life seems to offer no hopes. In moments

Why I am dropping out of the Anti-ACTA protest

Like many avid internet users, I have followed with interest the debate about ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement). After reading numerous articles, watched sensational videos, and discussed ad nauseam with friends, I have realized that what I have come across is a campaign hi-jacked by lies, myths and misconceptions as to rival Malta's misinformed divorce referendum campaign. I have to say that the videos on Youtube   got me worried. I quickly signed the petition, joined the Anti-ACTA groups, and prepared myself for a full-blown fight against the big-governments who want to intrude on our privacy and freedom of expression. Like our MEP Edward Scicluna invited us to do in the University debate last Wednesday, I did not try to understand the details of ACTA but rather saw who the players behind it were. But as usual, my logical instincts took over, and his call to not try to understand ACTA actually pushed me to read the text. And here's what I now know: ACTA is