Skip to main content

L-ewwel 100 jum - Indikazzjonijiet xejn sbieħ

L-opinjoni tiegħi ippublikata fuq inewsmalta.com


Jekk l-ewwel mitt jum huma indikazzjoni ta' kif ħa jkun qed jimxi Gvern fil-kumplament tal-leġislatura, l-indikazzjonijiet ma tantx huma sbieħ.
Rajna Gvern li ftit jimpurtah mill-interess nazzjonali, imma jpoġġi l-ewwel l-interess partiġġjan. U biex jagħmel dan, mhu qed ikollu l-ebda skrupli, la etiċi u lanqas umani.
Bdejna bir-riżenji sfurzati tas-Segretarji Permanenti u l-Bordijiet tal-Awtoritajiet, inklużi dawk regolatorji li għandhom ikunu indipendenti mill-Gvern fl-operat tagħhom. Rajna l-istess Bordijiet jimtlew b’kandidati, kunsilliera, Sindki, jew nies li ħarġu għonqhom fil-kampanja elettorali tal-Partit Laburist. Sa anke qed immorru għall-estremità li nipproponu nibdlu l-liġi biex anke Membri Parlamentari jkunu jistgħu jpoġġu f’dawn il-Bordijiet, mingħajr ma nikkunsidraw il-kunflitt li jinħoloq u r-rwol propju li għandu jaqdi deputat.
Twarrbu nies apolitiċi u tal-affari tagħhom bħal Perit Felice, ftit ġranet qabel kellu jirċievi għan-nom ta’ pajjiżna t-titlu ta’ Belt Kapitali Ewropea għal Valletta 2018, is-sodisfazzjon wara snin jaħdem fuq din in-nominazzjoni, biex postu ittieħed minn Jason Micallef mhux abbażi ta’ xi mertu jew kompetenza, imma fuq bażijiet purament politiċi.
Però dan tistennieh minn min sa mill-ewwel beda “jbażwar naqra ‘l hemm u naqra ‘l hawn” anke’ f’dik li hi etika. U dan qed iwassal biex il-Prim Ministru jibda jitlef il-kontroll ankè fuq il-Kabinett tiegħu. Il-każ ta’ Franco Mercieca, apparti il-ksur tal-Kodiċi ta’ Etika tal-Ministri, wassal biex il-Prim Ministru gideb lill-poplu meta qal li Mercieca ħa jkun qed jagħmel biss xogħol bla ħlas fl-isptar nhar ta’ Ħadd fuq operazzjonijiet li ħadd ieħor ma jagħmilhom. Nuqqas ta’ etika u dekor intwera wkoll mill-Ministru Mallia meta biex ħabbar amnestija, minflok konferenza stampa, għamel mass meeting fil-ħabs fejn rajnieh jitgħannaq mal-priġunieri.
Jidher li l-Gvern irrealizza wkoll li ħa jkun impossibli jżomm il-wegħdi li saru lil kulħadd qabel l-elezzjoni, u f’tentattiv biex ibatti l-istennija tan-nies, kien lest li jdaħħal lill-pajjiżna fil-proċedura tad-defiċit eċċessiv, bl-iskuża li din hi tort tal-Gvern preċedenti. Dan meta l-verità hi li sal-ewwel tliet xhur ta’ din is-sena, il-Gvern preċedenti ħalla lil pajjiżna bl-ogħla tkabbir ekonomiku fl-Ewropa, tnaqqis fid-defiċit, u żieda fid-dħul tal-Gvern.
Erġajna smajna bi transfers vendikattivi, li apparti mill-effetti fuq il-ħaddiema infushom, kellhom effetti negattivi fuq il-pazjenti, speċjalment dawk l-aktar vulnerabbli bħal pazjent bid-demenzja f’San Vinċenz.
Punt pożittiv li rajna kien l-emenda li saret biex nies bħal Joanne Cassar ikunu jistgħu jiżżewwġu u jgħixu ħajjithom. Ta’ dan ngħid ‘Prosit’ ukoll lil Mario de Marco tal-apoloġija pubblika u bla tlaqliq li għamel fil-Parlament li xi ħaġa bħal din ma ingħatatx priorità qabel.
Ftit kienu però l-inizjattivi ġodda li rajna f’dawn l-ewwel mitt jum. Il-priorità kienet biex mit-taxxi tagħna lkoll inħallsu lura għal kampanja “Tagħna Lkoll”. Fl-istess ħin, minn għalina ippruvajna nnaqsu n-nefqa billi nitfu l-fjamma eterna quddiem il-Monument tal-Gwerra, jew innaqsu mis-servizz tas-saħħa, mentri żidna bla bżonn l-ispiża amministrattiva bl-ikbar Kabinett fl-istorja ta’ Malta, u bl-akbar numru ta’ ħaddiema minn barra ċ-ċivil li ddaħlu jaħdmu fis-Segretarjati u Ministeri. Mhux ta’ b’xejn li fi kliem il-Ministru tal-Finanzi stess, il-Kummissjoni Ewropea m’għadhiex temmen lill-Gvern Malti f’dak li hu pjan ekonomiku.
L-iżjed ħaġa li ddejjaqni hija li għal kull kritika li ssirlu, il-Prim Ministru jew jisparixxi u ma jikkummentax, jew sempliċiment jirrispondi bl-argument ta’ “għax ma tarawx x’għamel ħaddieħor?”. Meta jagħmel dan l-argument, nitħawwad biex nifhem x’ried ifisser meta wiegħed bidla fid-direzzjoni. Hemm bżonn jirrealizza kemm jista’ jkun malajr li issa m’għadux fl-Oppożizzjoni, u jrid jirrispondi kontinwament għall-operat tal-Gvern.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who's the real monster?

I usually hate comparisons, but some very different reactions from the 'great unthinking' rabble do merit some analysis. In May this year, the notorious dog Star was found buried alive . A prima facie , this looked liked the most horrific case of animal cruelty, and is still considered so by some. The perpetrator was described by the sensitive and caring animal-lovers as a villain, a heartless monster, deserving of death, stoning, or even to be 'buried alive in the same manner'. But what did Mr. Vella actually do, according to the testimony heard in Court? Star was sick. It was shedding fur, and quite old already, and its owner did not afford the treatment. In trying to save some money from paying for the dog to be put to sleep and killed properly by vets, she gave it to Mr. Vella to have it killed himself. Nothing much to make people angry till now. Mercy-killing of very sick and suffering animals is widely done and usually acceptable. You may

Shema Yisrael, the cries of the Palestinian people

You live a peaceful life in a modest home. You've never bothered anyone and you've never caused trouble. Out of the blues, a group of people claim that they should live in your house. Why? Because they have been persecuted in a war, and they claim that some 5,000 years ago, their God had told them your home was their promised land. Somehow, the whole community agrees with their wishes, and asks you to grant them your spare-bedroom. You oblige. After a few months, they take the whole top-floor. In a few year's time, they take over your kitchen. After a few more years, they own your house and keep you and your family locked in the bathroom. They don't even allow you to get out, while they strip-search you the few times they do. Even if it's a medical emergency. Sometimes not even medical personnel and ambulances are allowed to see to your needs while your children die in your hands. Desperation starts hitting you. Life seems to offer no hopes. In moments

Why I am dropping out of the Anti-ACTA protest

Like many avid internet users, I have followed with interest the debate about ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement). After reading numerous articles, watched sensational videos, and discussed ad nauseam with friends, I have realized that what I have come across is a campaign hi-jacked by lies, myths and misconceptions as to rival Malta's misinformed divorce referendum campaign. I have to say that the videos on Youtube   got me worried. I quickly signed the petition, joined the Anti-ACTA groups, and prepared myself for a full-blown fight against the big-governments who want to intrude on our privacy and freedom of expression. Like our MEP Edward Scicluna invited us to do in the University debate last Wednesday, I did not try to understand the details of ACTA but rather saw who the players behind it were. But as usual, my logical instincts took over, and his call to not try to understand ACTA actually pushed me to read the text. And here's what I now know: ACTA is