Skip to main content

Three months...three lies


Do you remember Muscat on Bondiplus, when he and Gonzi had to react to a number of statements made by the presenter?

One of them was:  ‘in politics you may not always be able to tell the truth’.

Gonzi had reacted with a clear: “Definitely not. You must always tell the truth, above all, in politics. This is a cardinal principle.”

Muscat had replied: “Sometimes you have to tell the truth.”

In the first three months of his premiership it has already become apparent that the 'Sometimes' is going to be pretty rare.

In three months, Muscat has already officially lied three times.

He lied when government denied that Micallef was going to be made V18 chairman. He was later in fact made.

He lied when he said that he had successfully negotiated a special deal with the Commission regarding the Excessive Deficit Procedure. The Commission has flatly denied any special agreement, and reitarated that the EDP opened against Malta follows the procedure established by the treaties. This after the previous PN government ended the first quarter of this year and its last quarter in government with a reduction in the deficit, an increase in government revenue, and the biggest GDP growth in Europe.

He has again been caught lying when he had said that Franco Mercieca will be only seeing cases where he is the sole practitioner in the field, for few hours a week, without remuneration, for the benefit of the patients. Today we know Franco earns €3600 in one morning doing common cosmetic surgery and cataract operations which can be performed by many other ophtalmolgists.

We have a Prime Minister we cannot trust, a Code of Ethics which is not followed, a part-time Cabinet with no shame, and a government which by its own statements is not believed by the EU Commission.

That's just the change in direction we needed.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I am dropping out of the Anti-ACTA protest

Like many avid internet users, I have followed with interest the debate about ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement). After reading numerous articles, watched sensational videos, and discussed ad nauseam with friends, I have realized that what I have come across is a campaign hi-jacked by lies, myths and misconceptions as to rival Malta's misinformed divorce referendum campaign. I have to say that the videos on Youtube   got me worried. I quickly signed the petition, joined the Anti-ACTA groups, and prepared myself for a full-blown fight against the big-governments who want to intrude on our privacy and freedom of expression. Like our MEP Edward Scicluna invited us to do in the University debate last Wednesday, I did not try to understand the details of ACTA but rather saw who the players behind it were. But as usual, my logical instincts took over, and his call to not try to understand ACTA actually pushed me to read the text. And here's what I now know: ACTA is ...

Who's the real monster?

I usually hate comparisons, but some very different reactions from the 'great unthinking' rabble do merit some analysis. In May this year, the notorious dog Star was found buried alive . A prima facie , this looked liked the most horrific case of animal cruelty, and is still considered so by some. The perpetrator was described by the sensitive and caring animal-lovers as a villain, a heartless monster, deserving of death, stoning, or even to be 'buried alive in the same manner'. But what did Mr. Vella actually do, according to the testimony heard in Court? Star was sick. It was shedding fur, and quite old already, and its owner did not afford the treatment. In trying to save some money from paying for the dog to be put to sleep and killed properly by vets, she gave it to Mr. Vella to have it killed himself. Nothing much to make people angry till now. Mercy-killing of very sick and suffering animals is widely done and usually a...

The Church and its riches

The above pictures has lately been doing rounds on facebook. Posted comments refer to injustice, hypocrisy, and of the Church not practising what it preaches. It seems it has become a common trend to blame the Church for everything under the sun. Hitting at the Church is the new way of looking cool. But before joining the bandwagon of shares, likes and comments, let me try to analyze the points this photo is trying to make. The first one: the Church is immensely rich. Well, it could be, but what do most of these riches constitute? Most of the Church's "riches" are fixed immovable assets, of which most are important human heritage. They can practically never be sold. Let's just say that the Pope sells all his adornments (provided anyone wants to buy them), maybe even Michelangelo's Pieta, and once we're at it , yes, maybe he should also sell the Sistine Chapel and have it converted to apartments. Then what? Apart from making UNESCO and the rest of human...