Skip to main content

Mitna ghalxejn?



I was in the process of writing an article on the historical distortions and hogwash arguments being brought up by the campaign advocating for the removal of the George Cross from the Maltese Flag.

Luckily, someone has done it before me and explained it perfectly. Here's the link to Reuben Sciberras' article in the Malta Independent on Sunday: http://www.independent.com.mt/articles/2013-09-29/opinions/cross-eyed-flag-bearers-2746843143/

I highlight the most relevant parts below:

"When a national flag is changed (either completely or partially) the motivation is usually because the element being removed is something that brings shame to that nation."
"I am no anglophile, but claiming that the George Cross is just a medal is reductionist in nature and insulting in substance. Assertions that the medal has no value as it was awarded by a foreign power (whatever that may mean) are complete hogwash. No amount of fact twisting and distorting the historical context can deny the significance of this honour; the fact that, for the first time, it was not given to a person but to an entire population; how it continues to highlight the values of human bravery and – in the case of its award to the people of Malta – the heroism shown in the fight for freedom and democracy. So no, it is not ‘just’ a medal. It is a symbol of everything that Malta and its people went through during the Second World War.
I’m afraid that this recent initiative to lobby for the elimination of the George Cross from our national flag is yet another idea from that magnificent repository of political indoctrination inherited from the Mintoffian era. Unfortunately, the “Mitna ghal xejn, mitna ghal barrani” (We died for nothing, we died for the foreigner) philosophy – with which those of my generation or slightly older had the unpleasantness to be force-fed in our formative years – is still prevalent within some sections of the population. Is it that hard to understand that the war would have reached our shores irrespective of whether we were an independent state or not? How is it that there are still those who believe that our ancestors died in vain, and died for a cause which was not theirs?"


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why I am dropping out of the Anti-ACTA protest

Like many avid internet users, I have followed with interest the debate about ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement). After reading numerous articles, watched sensational videos, and discussed ad nauseam with friends, I have realized that what I have come across is a campaign hi-jacked by lies, myths and misconceptions as to rival Malta's misinformed divorce referendum campaign. I have to say that the videos on Youtube   got me worried. I quickly signed the petition, joined the Anti-ACTA groups, and prepared myself for a full-blown fight against the big-governments who want to intrude on our privacy and freedom of expression. Like our MEP Edward Scicluna invited us to do in the University debate last Wednesday, I did not try to understand the details of ACTA but rather saw who the players behind it were. But as usual, my logical instincts took over, and his call to not try to understand ACTA actually pushed me to read the text. And here's what I now know: ACTA is ...
19 comments
Read more

Who's the real monster?

I usually hate comparisons, but some very different reactions from the 'great unthinking' rabble do merit some analysis. In May this year, the notorious dog Star was found buried alive . A prima facie , this looked liked the most horrific case of animal cruelty, and is still considered so by some. The perpetrator was described by the sensitive and caring animal-lovers as a villain, a heartless monster, deserving of death, stoning, or even to be 'buried alive in the same manner'. But what did Mr. Vella actually do, according to the testimony heard in Court? Star was sick. It was shedding fur, and quite old already, and its owner did not afford the treatment. In trying to save some money from paying for the dog to be put to sleep and killed properly by vets, she gave it to Mr. Vella to have it killed himself. Nothing much to make people angry till now. Mercy-killing of very sick and suffering animals is widely done and usually a...
17 comments
Read more

The Church and its riches

The above pictures has lately been doing rounds on facebook. Posted comments refer to injustice, hypocrisy, and of the Church not practising what it preaches. It seems it has become a common trend to blame the Church for everything under the sun. Hitting at the Church is the new way of looking cool. But before joining the bandwagon of shares, likes and comments, let me try to analyze the points this photo is trying to make. The first one: the Church is immensely rich. Well, it could be, but what do most of these riches constitute? Most of the Church's "riches" are fixed immovable assets, of which most are important human heritage. They can practically never be sold. Let's just say that the Pope sells all his adornments (provided anyone wants to buy them), maybe even Michelangelo's Pieta, and once we're at it , yes, maybe he should also sell the Sistine Chapel and have it converted to apartments. Then what? Apart from making UNESCO and the rest of human...
10 comments
Read more