Skip to main content

Malta - one of the most spied nations

You heard that right, The Guardian has revealed that Malta is one of the most spied nations by its own government, with 3,773 such requests processed last year alone. And these are the requests made just to one operator: Vodafone, which has roughly half the market share. The total number of requests made to all operators would approximately be double that figure. More details available on these links:

http://www.tvm.com.mt/news/malta-l-iktar-nazzjon-spjunat-fl-ewropa/

http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20140606/local/vodafone-lifts-lid-on-governments-phone-spying-capability.522183



In Malta, it is the Malta Secret Services which has direct access to such data, and it only requires the written consent of the Home Affairs Minister to carry out any such tapping. That means the written consent of the trustworthy and never-caught-in-a-lie Manuel Mallia (yes, it's called satire).

This is a serious issue of privacy and transparency. Why is such a high proportion of our population being spied upon? Why is our government making all these thousands of requests? And is this data being used only to fight criminality, or is it being shared for other purposes?

Quite a number of people before the last MEP election have told me that they have received Labour Party campaign messages within a few hours of buying new SIM cards (i.e. new mobile numbers), without having ever used the phone and before they even shared their number with family and friends. How is the Labour Party obtaining such data? What assurances can we have that government is not using its powers to infringe on our privacy?

Legislation which controls government powers in this area is in a serious need to be revised.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I am dropping out of the Anti-ACTA protest

Like many avid internet users, I have followed with interest the debate about ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement). After reading numerous articles, watched sensational videos, and discussed ad nauseam with friends, I have realized that what I have come across is a campaign hi-jacked by lies, myths and misconceptions as to rival Malta's misinformed divorce referendum campaign. I have to say that the videos on Youtube   got me worried. I quickly signed the petition, joined the Anti-ACTA groups, and prepared myself for a full-blown fight against the big-governments who want to intrude on our privacy and freedom of expression. Like our MEP Edward Scicluna invited us to do in the University debate last Wednesday, I did not try to understand the details of ACTA but rather saw who the players behind it were. But as usual, my logical instincts took over, and his call to not try to understand ACTA actually pushed me to read the text. And here's what I now know: ACTA is ...

Who's the real monster?

I usually hate comparisons, but some very different reactions from the 'great unthinking' rabble do merit some analysis. In May this year, the notorious dog Star was found buried alive . A prima facie , this looked liked the most horrific case of animal cruelty, and is still considered so by some. The perpetrator was described by the sensitive and caring animal-lovers as a villain, a heartless monster, deserving of death, stoning, or even to be 'buried alive in the same manner'. But what did Mr. Vella actually do, according to the testimony heard in Court? Star was sick. It was shedding fur, and quite old already, and its owner did not afford the treatment. In trying to save some money from paying for the dog to be put to sleep and killed properly by vets, she gave it to Mr. Vella to have it killed himself. Nothing much to make people angry till now. Mercy-killing of very sick and suffering animals is widely done and usually a...

The Church and its riches

The above pictures has lately been doing rounds on facebook. Posted comments refer to injustice, hypocrisy, and of the Church not practising what it preaches. It seems it has become a common trend to blame the Church for everything under the sun. Hitting at the Church is the new way of looking cool. But before joining the bandwagon of shares, likes and comments, let me try to analyze the points this photo is trying to make. The first one: the Church is immensely rich. Well, it could be, but what do most of these riches constitute? Most of the Church's "riches" are fixed immovable assets, of which most are important human heritage. They can practically never be sold. Let's just say that the Pope sells all his adornments (provided anyone wants to buy them), maybe even Michelangelo's Pieta, and once we're at it , yes, maybe he should also sell the Sistine Chapel and have it converted to apartments. Then what? Apart from making UNESCO and the rest of human...