Skip to main content

Labour's sun sets with Muscat

This article was first published in the MaltaToday on Sunday 1st November 2015, and uploaded online on www.maltatoday.com.mt on Wednesday 3rd November 2015.


http://www.maltatoday.com.mt/comment/blogs/58868/labours_sun_sets_with_muscat#.VjywNa6rT65





In periods of economic upturn, it is time to invest not consume.

While no one can deny that on a macro level the economy has kept on performing well, things are not as rosy as Muscat is trying to paint them.

Muscat inherited a strong economy. Back in 2012, Malta and Germany were the only two Eurozone countries being praised by Brussels for improving their competitiveness and fiscal stability and were the EU's best performing economies during the worst financial crisis of the past decades. We were being presented as role models for other EU members. Truly the best in Europe.

Malta ranked third among European countries when it comes to youth employment and unemployment was steadily decreasing notwithstanding the number of employees in the civil service was being constantly decreased as well. In the meantime, in the budget negotiation which saw the EU slash most of its funds, Malta managed to secure more than €1.2 billion in funds for the following six years.

Indeed, the sun did not rise in March 2013 as some want us to believe.

This government is to be credited for keeping the momentum going and not creating any economic shocks, aided by a much improved international economic situation and a huge drop in the price of oil.

One would expect though that during such an economic upturn, the government would seize the opportunity to move its expenditure away from consumption towards capital investment. This was the clear strategic path previous administrations had been taking: reducing subsidies and recurrent expenditure and increasing investment. The privatisation of the dockyards and public transport and the removal of subsides on water and electricity bills, though unpopular, allowed government to shift its expenditure towards more meaningful capital projects which benefitted the country and future generations, such as the electricity interconnector, the cleaner and more efficient BWSC electricity generation plant (now sold to Shanghai Electric), road infrastructure projects, flood relief projects, the Life Sciences Park, the Oncology Hospital and the new MCAST campus. Projects, some of which partly financed by EU funds, which have kept the economic momentum going right up into this legislature and which will bring long-term benefits.

We have truly witnessed a "clear change in direction" in this sense. Capital expenditure has been reduced budget after budget (€125 million less for 2016). Renewable energy projects have been halted. No investment schemes to aid ailing industries, which have led to a worrying €700 million decrease in the country's exports, have been earmarked. No new economic industries are being projected, while the rate of increase of jobs in the hugely successful gaming, information technology and financial services sectors has decreased, while the rate of increase of the average wage has halved in two years.

On the other hand, recurrent expenditure has increased considerably. Public service salaries have off-shot budgetary predictions by €30 million in this year alone, and will be exceeding the €800 million annual mark by next year. The number of public service employees has increased by the thousands, and according to NSO statistics mostly in public administration (including many messengers, a trade astonishingly increasing in demand in the 'progressive' age of emails) and not in health and education as the government tries to convince us. Consultancy and travel funds seem to have no limit, whilst in such positive and optimistic times students, workers and pensioners have to make do with measly increases.

So yes, the economy has grown, but it is really a pity that this is being mostly fuelled by government consumption rather than by more meaningful investment. Public debt has increased by a staggering €600 million in just two years, and there is not a single capital or infrastructure project to show up for it except the ones started by the previous administration.

Responsible parents loan out money to invest in a better education for their children or to improve the quality of their home, but not to give it away in more pocket-money, even though that would endear them with their kids. They know it is neither sustainable nor productive.

If Muscat's "ten year plan in government" is simply to make people happy and fill in the pockets of those around him, leaving future generations to face the consequences once he comfortably retires, then he is the opposite of the "statesman" his supporters describe him to be.

It is also really ironic that Muscat is currently more worried about salami and sausages, than about more worrying carcinogenic issues his government should be tackling: the excess fumes caused by traffic, the continuous increase in nitrates percolating a depleted and widely abused water-table, and further erosion of our open spaces by greedy developers aided by his disregard to ODZ protection.

I am sure he is not so scientifically illiterate as to misunderstand a WHO report, so I suspect this is simply another feeble attempt to divert discussion away from the budget and the more recent scandals plaguing this government: the visa residence rackets in both Libya and Algeria, the public funds being wasted in unnecessary consultancies and nepotistic appointments, the Gaffarena land deals and the EU funds being withheld following irregularities flagged in the Coast Road project.

After all, didn't he say that it was Busuttil who needed to learn how to read reports and not himself?



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Shema Yisrael, the cries of the Palestinian people

You live a peaceful life in a modest home. You've never bothered anyone and you've never caused trouble. Out of the blues, a group of people claim that they should live in your house. Why? Because they have been persecuted in a war, and they claim that some 5,000 years ago, their God had told them your home was their promised land. Somehow, the whole community agrees with their wishes, and asks you to grant them your spare-bedroom. You oblige. After a few months, they take the whole top-floor. In a few year's time, they take over your kitchen. After a few more years, they own your house and keep you and your family locked in the bathroom. They don't even allow you to get out, while they strip-search you the few times they do. Even if it's a medical emergency. Sometimes not even medical personnel and ambulances are allowed to see to your needs while your children die in your hands. Desperation starts hitting you. Life seems to offer no hopes. In moments

The Great Energy Proposal

I followed the example of a facebook comment uploaded on another blog to work out the savings my household will make with Labour's energy proposals. Our bill for of €717.80 for 7 months is divided into: An electricity service charge of €36.86 Electricity consumption of €404.83 A water service charge of €33.46 Water consumption of €242.65 Through the new tariff scheme, reducing the electricity consumption bill by 25% and the water consumption bill by 5%, our bill will read: An electricity service charge of €36.86 Electricity consumption of €303.62 A water service charge of €33.46 Water consumption of €230.52 A total of €604.46 for the same 7 months. A reduction of €16.20 a month. But this reduction comes at what price? This grand plan, the one we have been expecting for all these years, will materialize  if  we find a private investor ready to fork out €500 million in capital investment,  if  we reach a 10-year fixed price agreement,  if we manage to b

Why I am dropping out of the Anti-ACTA protest

Like many avid internet users, I have followed with interest the debate about ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement). After reading numerous articles, watched sensational videos, and discussed ad nauseam with friends, I have realized that what I have come across is a campaign hi-jacked by lies, myths and misconceptions as to rival Malta's misinformed divorce referendum campaign. I have to say that the videos on Youtube   got me worried. I quickly signed the petition, joined the Anti-ACTA groups, and prepared myself for a full-blown fight against the big-governments who want to intrude on our privacy and freedom of expression. Like our MEP Edward Scicluna invited us to do in the University debate last Wednesday, I did not try to understand the details of ACTA but rather saw who the players behind it were. But as usual, my logical instincts took over, and his call to not try to understand ACTA actually pushed me to read the text. And here's what I now know: ACTA is