Skip to main content

Il-bidu tat-tmiem

Dan l-artiklu deher fil-ħarġa tan-Nazzjon tal-Erbgħa 3 ta' Frar 2016




Qed nibda l-artiklu b’din il-frażi għax hija l-mod li bih il-Kap tal-Partit Nazzjonalita Simon Busuttil iddeskriva xi jfisser l-iskandlu ta’ Gaffarena għal Gvern ta’ Muscat. Dan jista’ jkun il-bidu tat-tmiem ta’ dan il-Gvern.

Fl-opinjoni tiegħi, huma tlieta r-raġunijiet prinċipali għalfejn dan huwa minnu.

L-ewwel nett, dan l-iskandlu wera biÄ‹-Ä‹ar li mhux talli għandna Gvern li l-korruzzjoni ma jiÄ¡Ä¡ilidhiex, mhux talli għandna Gvern li mhux jikkontrolla l-iffangar ta’ dawk qrib tiegħu, iżda talli għandna Gvern li l-korruzzjoni jorganizzaha hu minn Kastilja. Din hija waħda mill-konklużjonijiet tar-rapport tal-Awditur Ä enerali, li kkonkluda li f’dan l-iskandlu kien hemm “kollużjoni”, u allura ftehim fil-moħbi biex isir gwadann illeÄ‹itu, bejn is-Segretarjat tal-Segretarju Parlamenteri fl-UffiÄ‹Ä‹ju tal-Prim Ministru, id-Dipartiment tal-Artijiet, u Gaffarena. Kien Gaffarena li iddeÄ‹ieda li jsir l-esproprju u x’ħa jieħu hu, u kien jaf minn qabel xtara ż-żewÄ¡ kwarti ta’ proprjeta’ li l-Gvern ħa jixtrieha minn għandu bi prezz ogħla.

Agħar minn hekk, waqt l-investigazzjoni tiegħu l-Awditur sab li matul dawn id-9 xhur mindu feÄ¡Ä¡ il-każ, il-minuti fil-file Ä¡ew rinumerati, u kien hemm korrispondenza li Ä¡iet mibdula d-data tagħha. Dan juri li matul dawn ix-xhur kien hemm attentat ta’ cover-up biex il-verita’ ma toħroÄ¡x. U allura huwa giddieb il-Prim Ministru meta jgħid li dan il-każ kien żball. Meta tieħu żball tara x’tagħmel biex tirranÄ¡ah, mhux tipprova tgħattieh. U żball ma tippjanahx minn qabel. Dan mhux żball. Dan frodi organizzat, maħsub u premeditat. U organizzat f’Kastilja.

It-tieni nett, dan l-iskandlu kompla jikkonferma kemm għandna Prim Ministru li ma jiddejjaq xejn jipprova jgħaddi l-poplu biż-żmien. Wara li rajnieh jigdeb u jirreÄ‹ta fil-messaÄ¡Ä¡ tal-Ewwel tas-Sena, issa ranieh jirreÄ‹ta bil-kawża li fetaħ hu bħala Deputat kontra l-Gvern tiegħu stess, biex forsi wara snin u snin il-Qorti, jikkonvinÄ‹ieha tħassarlu ftehim li iffirma l-Ministeru tiegħu għax jaħasra “ħa żball”. Mela l-ewwel il-Ministru tal-Lands Joseph Muscat waqqa’ l-kawża kontra l-Mexxej tal-Partit Laburista Joseph Muscat fuq l-Australia Hall. Imbagħad il-Ministru tal-Lands Joseph Muscat approva, mill-email privata tiegħu, minn wara dahar kulħadd, il-ftehim oxxen tal-Café Premier għax ma riedx “itawwal fil-Qorti”, kif b’mod ipokrita qed jagħmel issa fil-każ ta’ Gaffarena. Issa, għandna d-Deputat Joseph Muscat jiftaħ kawża kontra l-Ministru tal-Lands Joseph Muscat biex iħassar il-ftehim li dan għamel disa’ xhur ilu.

Taf x’qed nistennieh jagħmel biex jgħaqqad ir-reÄ‹ta? Jgħidilna li l-Prim Ministru Joseph Muscat ħa jkeÄ‹Ä‹i l-Ministru tal-Lands Joseph Muscat għax dan il-Ministru għaffeÄ¡ wisq f’dan id-Dipartiment f’sentejn biss!

It-tielet punt li ħareÄ¡ minn din l-istorja hija li għandna Korp tal-Pulizija pupazz f’idejn il-Gvern u f’idejn Gaffarena. Wara 9 xhur rieqed, jew ma jarax gazzetti, il-Kummissarju bagħat il-Pulizija jinvestigaw il-files tad-Dipartiment tal-Lands, f’reÄ‹ta oħra organizzatat minn Kastilja. Korp tal-Pulizija li ftit tax-xhur ilu kien immexxi minn Kummissarju li kien involut fin-negozju mal-Gaffarena li suppost uliedu kienu qed jinvestigaw. Illum għandna t-tielet Kummissarju f’sentejn appuntat minn dan il-Gvern, li jiddispjaÄ‹ini ngħid qed jiddiżappunta wkoll. U n-nuqqas ta’ fiduÄ‹ja fil-Korp tal-Pulizija hija inkwetanti ferm mhux biss għall-Oppożizzjoni, imma għal poplu li jippretendi li dawn jimxu bl-istess kejl ta’ liÄ¡i ma’ kulħadd.

Infakkar li ftit tax-xhur ilu, Ä¡ie rappurtat ukoll kif is-Sindku Laburista fil-Gudja bagħat il-Pulizija għand resident li deherlu li ma kellux imur jinqeda fil-bini tal-Kunsill “għax jgħid kontrieh”. Abbuż Ä‹ar ta’ poter mis-Sindku, u abbuż tal-Pulizija li tħallew li jintużaw għal dik li hi intimidazzjoni politika. L-Ispettur taż-Å»ejtun intalab jispjega dan. Il-Kummissarju tal-Pulizija Ä¡ie infurmat b’dan. Iżda ħadd minnhom ma kellu d-diÄ‹enza jwieÄ¡eb jew jieħu azzjoni.

Għax forsi f’dan il-każ, għadu ħadd ma Ä¡ibdilhom l-ispaga minn Kastilja.

Il-poplu issa qed jiddejjaq jassisti għal pantomimi u l-inÄ¡ustizzji, fejn min għandu l-flus u l-poter ikun ‘il fuq mil-liÄ¡i, isir miljunarju, waqt li l-ħaddiem, l-istudent, il-pensjonant, u l-onest, iridu jitqannew biż-żidiet miżeri fil-pagi u l-pensjonijiet, bl-għoli sfrenat tal-ħajja, u bis-serq ta’ kuljum mill-pompi tal-petrol.

Iva ħbieb, il-poplu qed jiftaħ għajnejh, u dan jaf huwa l-bidu tat-tmiem ta’ dan l-aktar Gvern korrott fl-istorja ta’ pajjiżna, biex jekk Alla jrid, flimkien ma’ Simon Busuttil, nerÄ¡għu nnaddfu l-politika, insaħħu l-istituzzjonijiet kif jixraq lil pajjiż demokratiku u Ewropew fis-seklu 21, u nibnu ekonomija mibnija fuq investiment u xogħol reali li jgawdi minnu kulħadd, mhux fuq bejgħ ta’ passaporti u ogħti ta’ art b’xejn li qed igawdu minnha biss tal-qalba.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who's the real monster?

I usually hate comparisons, but some very different reactions from the 'great unthinking' rabble do merit some analysis. In May this year, the notorious dog Star was found buried alive . A prima facie , this looked liked the most horrific case of animal cruelty, and is still considered so by some. The perpetrator was described by the sensitive and caring animal-lovers as a villain, a heartless monster, deserving of death, stoning, or even to be 'buried alive in the same manner'. But what did Mr. Vella actually do, according to the testimony heard in Court? Star was sick. It was shedding fur, and quite old already, and its owner did not afford the treatment. In trying to save some money from paying for the dog to be put to sleep and killed properly by vets, she gave it to Mr. Vella to have it killed himself. Nothing much to make people angry till now. Mercy-killing of very sick and suffering animals is widely done and usually acceptable. You may

Shema Yisrael, the cries of the Palestinian people

You live a peaceful life in a modest home. You've never bothered anyone and you've never caused trouble. Out of the blues, a group of people claim that they should live in your house. Why? Because they have been persecuted in a war, and they claim that some 5,000 years ago, their God had told them your home was their promised land. Somehow, the whole community agrees with their wishes, and asks you to grant them your spare-bedroom. You oblige. After a few months, they take the whole top-floor. In a few year's time, they take over your kitchen. After a few more years, they own your house and keep you and your family locked in the bathroom. They don't even allow you to get out, while they strip-search you the few times they do. Even if it's a medical emergency. Sometimes not even medical personnel and ambulances are allowed to see to your needs while your children die in your hands. Desperation starts hitting you. Life seems to offer no hopes. In moments

Why I am dropping out of the Anti-ACTA protest

Like many avid internet users, I have followed with interest the debate about ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement). After reading numerous articles, watched sensational videos, and discussed ad nauseam with friends, I have realized that what I have come across is a campaign hi-jacked by lies, myths and misconceptions as to rival Malta's misinformed divorce referendum campaign. I have to say that the videos on Youtube   got me worried. I quickly signed the petition, joined the Anti-ACTA groups, and prepared myself for a full-blown fight against the big-governments who want to intrude on our privacy and freedom of expression. Like our MEP Edward Scicluna invited us to do in the University debate last Wednesday, I did not try to understand the details of ACTA but rather saw who the players behind it were. But as usual, my logical instincts took over, and his call to not try to understand ACTA actually pushed me to read the text. And here's what I now know: ACTA is