Skip to main content

Jiddeċiedi...jew ma jiddeċidix?



Artiklu li deher fin-Nazzjon tal-Erbgħa 13 ta' April, 2016



Ħafna drabi nisimgħu lill-politiċi jagħmlu dikjarazzjonijiet bombastiċi. Qisu iktar ma’ jiddikjaraw xi ħaġa b’mod bombastiku, u forsi eżaġerat, iżjed jidhru kemm huma mexxejja, kemm huma qawwija, kemm huma b’saħħithom. U kultant, dikjarazzjoni, kelma, frażi, tant jirrepetuwha li għalkemm mhux bilfors tkun eżattament korretta, in-nies jispiċċaw jassoċċjawha magħhom daqs li kieku kienet minnha.

Jekk hemm politiku li huwa espert ta’ din it-tattika huwa bla dubju ta’ xejn Joseph Muscat. Issa qed drajna li kulmeta l-Prim Ministru jiddikjara xi ħaġa b’mod ripetut, ikun ifisser eżatt bil-maqlub. Waħda minn dawn id-dikjarazzjonijiet ripetuti hija li Joseph Muscat huwa “Prim Ministru li jiddeċiedi”. Tant irrepetieha, tant intużat fil-propoganda tal-Labour, illi kważi illum kulħadd jemminha.

Fil-konferenza ġenerali tal-Ħadd li għadda, Joseph Muscat mar pass oltre’. Qalilna li hu “jogħxa bid-deċiżjonijiet”. U meta xi ħaġa jirrepetieha b’mod daqshekk bombastiku, mal-ewwel inwaqqaf widnejja ħa nisma’ eżatt xi jkun qed jgħid, għax ħafna drabi tkun tfisser bil-kontra.

U naħseb li f’dan il-każ ukoll, il-verità hija eżatt bil-maqlub.

Tiftakru meta kien hemm il-każ tal-isparatura tax-xufier ta’ Manwel Mallia? U wara kien hemm l-istqarrija giddieba li ħarġet minn Ramona Attard, dak iż-żmien Kap tal-Komunikazzjoni tal-Ministru, u Kurt Farrugia, Kap tal-Komunikazzjoni tal-Prim Ministru, li qalu li kien hemm biss warning shots? Naħseb ilkoll tiftakru li l-Prim Ministru dam ħafna, dam ġimgħat sħaħ, biex iddeċieda jieħu azzjoni. Kien biss wara li ħarġu telefonati irrekordjati li wrew l-indħil tal-uffiċċju tiegħu u tal-Kummissarju tal-Pulizija fl-attentat ta’ cover-up, li inkixef biss grazzi għall-ġurnalisti li laħqu ħadu r-ritratti qabel il-Pulizija ġarrew il-vetturi qabel biss wasal il-maġistrat inkwerenti. U iddeċieda biss wara rabja pubblika, u wara li kien inġieb dahru mal-ħajt mill-pressjoni tal-Oppożizzjoni u tal-media indipendenti. U lanqas iddeċieda kollox! Għax sal-lum, Kurt Farrugia għadu f’postu, Ramona Attard għadha tpappieha f’karigi u konsulenzi oħra, u l-ex-Kummissarju qed imexxi l-Aġenzija tal-Infurzar Lokali.

Tiftakru l-iskandlu ta’ Gaffarena? Kemm dam eżatt Joseph Muscat biex iddeċieda li jneħħi lil Michael Falzon? Aktar minn disa’ xhur minn meta kellu l-fatti f’idejh!

Tiftakru l-każ ta’ Ian Borġ? L-Ombudsman riċentement għamilha ċara li għadda d-dettalji kollha lill-Prim Ministru, fuq kif Borġ uża “metodi qarrieqa” (devious methods) fl-applikazzjoni tiegħu. Hemm ukoll il-każ ta’ miżapproprjazzjoni ta’ fondi Ewropej meta Ian Borġ kien għadu Sindku ta’ Ħad-Dingli li għadu taħt investigazzjoni. Iddeċieda biex jieħu azzjoni Joseph Muscat bid-dettalji tar-rapport tal-Ombudsman ilhom xhur quddiemu?

Tiftakru l-ħatra tal-maġistrati ġodda, Caroline Farrugia Frendo u Ingrid Zammit Young? Il-ħatra tal-maġistrati l-ġodda hija responsabbiltà tal-Gvern immexxi minn Joseph Muscat. X’għamel Joseph Muscat meta ħareġ ċar li dawn kienu kontra l-Kostituzzjoni? Minflok iddeċieda, tefa’ l-każ quddiem il-Kummissjoni tal-Amministrazzjoni tal-Ġustizzja, li r-rwol tagħha huwa s-sorveljanza tal-maġistrati u l-imħallfin fil-kariga u mhux in-nomini ta’ dawk ġodda. Anke’ f’dik li hi waħda mir-responsabbilitajiet tiegħu, beża’ jieħu deċiżjoni u staħba wara Kummissjoni oħra.

L-unika drabi li l-Prim Ministru iddeċieda f’tebqa ta’ għajn kien fil-każ ta’ Anġlu Farrugia, li qabad u neħħieh mingħajr ma ħasibha darbtejn għax kien ilu jfittex okkażjoni biex jeħles minnu, fil-każ tal-Café Premier, fejn mill-email privat tiegħu qabad u ta l-ordni biex imexxu l-pagament ta’ €4.2 miljun minn flusna, u biex waqqa’ l-każ tal-Australia Hall li kien hemm miftuħ kontra l-Partit tiegħu. F’kelma waħda, l-unika okkażjonijiet fejn Joseph Muscat iddeċieda malajr kien meta kien jaqbel lilu u lil but dawk ta’ madwaru.

Altru’ milli Prim Ministru li jiddeċiedi. Joseph Muscat huwa l-iktar Prim Ministru fl-istorja ta’ pajjiżna li beża’ jieħu deċiżjoni u jew prova jaħrab minnha bit-tama li l-poplu jinsa, jew prova jfarfarha fuq ħaddieħor. Pero’ f’dan il-każ mhux ħa jirnexxielu. Jekk hemm bżonn, ħa nkomplu nfakkruh kuljum. U issa, mhux ħa nfakkruh biss li messu jkeċċi lil Konrad Mizzi u lil Keith Schembri. Issa li iddefendiehom għal dawn il-ġimgħat kollha meta kellu l-fatti quddiemu qabel biss dawn ħarġu fil-pubbliku, dmirna huwa li nfakkru li għal ġid ta’ pajjiżna, għandu jiddeċiedi li jwarrab hu. Dik hija l-unika deċiżjoni iebsa u onorabbli li baqagħlu.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who's the real monster?

I usually hate comparisons, but some very different reactions from the 'great unthinking' rabble do merit some analysis. In May this year, the notorious dog Star was found buried alive . A prima facie , this looked liked the most horrific case of animal cruelty, and is still considered so by some. The perpetrator was described by the sensitive and caring animal-lovers as a villain, a heartless monster, deserving of death, stoning, or even to be 'buried alive in the same manner'. But what did Mr. Vella actually do, according to the testimony heard in Court? Star was sick. It was shedding fur, and quite old already, and its owner did not afford the treatment. In trying to save some money from paying for the dog to be put to sleep and killed properly by vets, she gave it to Mr. Vella to have it killed himself. Nothing much to make people angry till now. Mercy-killing of very sick and suffering animals is widely done and usually acceptable. You may

Shema Yisrael, the cries of the Palestinian people

You live a peaceful life in a modest home. You've never bothered anyone and you've never caused trouble. Out of the blues, a group of people claim that they should live in your house. Why? Because they have been persecuted in a war, and they claim that some 5,000 years ago, their God had told them your home was their promised land. Somehow, the whole community agrees with their wishes, and asks you to grant them your spare-bedroom. You oblige. After a few months, they take the whole top-floor. In a few year's time, they take over your kitchen. After a few more years, they own your house and keep you and your family locked in the bathroom. They don't even allow you to get out, while they strip-search you the few times they do. Even if it's a medical emergency. Sometimes not even medical personnel and ambulances are allowed to see to your needs while your children die in your hands. Desperation starts hitting you. Life seems to offer no hopes. In moments

Why I am dropping out of the Anti-ACTA protest

Like many avid internet users, I have followed with interest the debate about ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement). After reading numerous articles, watched sensational videos, and discussed ad nauseam with friends, I have realized that what I have come across is a campaign hi-jacked by lies, myths and misconceptions as to rival Malta's misinformed divorce referendum campaign. I have to say that the videos on Youtube   got me worried. I quickly signed the petition, joined the Anti-ACTA groups, and prepared myself for a full-blown fight against the big-governments who want to intrude on our privacy and freedom of expression. Like our MEP Edward Scicluna invited us to do in the University debate last Wednesday, I did not try to understand the details of ACTA but rather saw who the players behind it were. But as usual, my logical instincts took over, and his call to not try to understand ACTA actually pushed me to read the text. And here's what I now know: ACTA is