Skip to main content

Nirnexxu lkoll flimkien

Dan l-artiklu deher fin-Nazzjon tal-Erbgħa 14 ta' Settembru 2016

It-tema magħżula mill-Partit Nazzjonalista għall-festi tal-Indipendenza ma setgħetx kienet aktar f'waqtha. Nirnexxu lkoll flimkien. Għalfejn proprju din it-tema għall-Indipendenza ta' din is-sena?

Għax huwa ċar li filwaqt li ninsabu fi żmien fejn l-ekonomia sejra tajjeb, grazzi għax-xogħol siewi li sar u l-inċentivi li ttieħdu f’dawn l-aħħar 29 sena, żgur li maħniex nirnexxu lkoll. Hemm min qed jirnexxi, vera. Qed jirnexxu tal-qalba, dawk li huma qrib ta' Joseph Muscat, dawk li għenu fil-kampanja elettorali, dawk li wisq probabli taw donazzjonijiet lill-Partit Laburista.

Qed jirnexxu dawk li mingħajr ma jimmeritahom ingħataw karigi b'salarji li ħafna mill-ħaddiema lanqas biss joħolmuhom: Cyrus Engerer, li minkejja s-sentenza sospiża u n-nuqqas ta' clearance tas-sigurta', tant li Leo Brincat irrifjuta li jkun akkumpanjat minnu fil-lobbying tieghu ghal hatra fil-Qorti tal-Awdituri, qed jieħu ‘l fuq minn €80,000 fis-sena; Sai Mizzi u n-nofs miljun ewro li ħadet għalxejn; James Piscopo, li minkejja l-paga fenomenali tiegħu tħalla jiftaħ kumpanija privata waqt li jokkupa kariga pubblika kontra kull etika; Glenn Beddingfield u l-blog kollu gideb u ħdura tieghu li jikteb waqt li jitħallas minn fondi pubbliċi; Phyllis Muscat u l-bella kumpanija li tpoġġew fi rwoli mingħajr ma kellhom l-ebda esperjenza fihom; it-taparsi 'whistle-blower' fil-każ ta' Tonio Fenech li sfaċċatament ingħata 6,000 metru kwadru ta' art mill-Malta Enterprise mingħajr ma għandu ħaddiema rreġistrati miegħu, apparti kuntratti u jobs għalih u martu; il-Brigadier mhux kwalifikat tal-Forzi Armati li għandna, li ngħata erba' promozzjonijiet f’daqqa; u n-nies kollha li dehru fil-billboards tal-kampanja Laburista, li issa qed jitħallsu sew minn flusna. 

Qed jirnexxu magħhom dawk li għandhom biżżejjed biex jiftħu kontijiet u kumpaniji moħbija l-Panama u b’hekk, fi kliemhom, jaħbu dħul minn 'senseriji': Konrad Mizzi, Keith Schembri, Brian Tonna, u l-bniedem misterjuż l-ieħor, kumbinazzjoni kollha nies b'uffiċċju f'Kastilja. 

Qed jirnexxu l-iżviluppaturi tat-taparsi universita', taparsi Amerikana, li ingħataw biċċa art minn flusna biex jeqirduha u jiżviluppawha. Qed jirnexxi l-eks-proprjetarju tal-Cafe Premier, li grazzi għal email ta' Joseph Muscat, minn bniedem midjun bil-kbir mal-Gvern, spiċċa ha €4.2 miljuni. Qed jirnexxi Gaffarena, li xtara biċċa minn proprjeta' u sar miljunarju minn fuqha, grazzi għal Michael Falzon u l-pressjoni li għamel l-istaff tas-Segretarjat tiegħu f’Kastilja. Qed jirnexxu l-iżviluppaturi tal-powerstation il-ġdida, li ħa jagħmlu l-miljuni grazzi għall-garanzija bankarja li għamilnielhom aħna minn flusna.

Dawn huma n-nies li qed jirnexxu fiż-żmien li l-ekonomija sejra tajjeb u l-prezz taż-żejt niżel mal-art. Il-bqija? Qed jaraw il-kwalita' tal-ħajja tagħhom tiżdied jew le?

Dawk li jgħixu f'akkomodazzjoni soċjali? Qed jirnexxu meta l-kera għolitielhom b'ħames darbiet aktar? Il-ġenituri? Qed jirnexxu meta l-miżati tal-eżamijiet splodew? Il-ħaddiema? Qed jirnexxu meta ż-żidiet fil-pagi naqsu b'sitt darbiet anqas milli kienu fl-agħar tal-kriżi finanzjarja? Qed jirnexxu biż-żidiet miżeri ta’ 58ċ waqt li tal-qalba jiffangaw u jistgħanew?

Għalhekk, issa hu l-mument li dawk kollha ta’ rieda tajba jingħaqdu wara l-Kap tal-Partit Nazzjonalista Simon Busuttil, biex flimkien, nerġgħu nibnu pajjiż fejn jirnexxi kulħadd u mhux il-ftit, fejn il-liġi u l-ġustizzja jkunu l-istess għal kulħadd, fejn kulmin jagħmel ħażin, hu min hu, jigi investigat, u min hu postu l-ħabs imur il-ħabs u mhux jgħaddieha lixxa f’Kastilja.


Issa hu l-mument li flimkien naħdmu biex nibnu l-Malta li rridu ngħixu fiha. Malta iżjed ġusta, Malta iżjed miftuħa, Malta fejn kulħadd ikollu l-istess opportunita’ li jirnexxi.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why I am dropping out of the Anti-ACTA protest

Like many avid internet users, I have followed with interest the debate about ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement). After reading numerous articles, watched sensational videos, and discussed ad nauseam with friends, I have realized that what I have come across is a campaign hi-jacked by lies, myths and misconceptions as to rival Malta's misinformed divorce referendum campaign. I have to say that the videos on Youtube   got me worried. I quickly signed the petition, joined the Anti-ACTA groups, and prepared myself for a full-blown fight against the big-governments who want to intrude on our privacy and freedom of expression. Like our MEP Edward Scicluna invited us to do in the University debate last Wednesday, I did not try to understand the details of ACTA but rather saw who the players behind it were. But as usual, my logical instincts took over, and his call to not try to understand ACTA actually pushed me to read the text. And here's what I now know: ACTA is ...

Who's the real monster?

I usually hate comparisons, but some very different reactions from the 'great unthinking' rabble do merit some analysis. In May this year, the notorious dog Star was found buried alive . A prima facie , this looked liked the most horrific case of animal cruelty, and is still considered so by some. The perpetrator was described by the sensitive and caring animal-lovers as a villain, a heartless monster, deserving of death, stoning, or even to be 'buried alive in the same manner'. But what did Mr. Vella actually do, according to the testimony heard in Court? Star was sick. It was shedding fur, and quite old already, and its owner did not afford the treatment. In trying to save some money from paying for the dog to be put to sleep and killed properly by vets, she gave it to Mr. Vella to have it killed himself. Nothing much to make people angry till now. Mercy-killing of very sick and suffering animals is widely done and usually a...

The Church and its riches

The above pictures has lately been doing rounds on facebook. Posted comments refer to injustice, hypocrisy, and of the Church not practising what it preaches. It seems it has become a common trend to blame the Church for everything under the sun. Hitting at the Church is the new way of looking cool. But before joining the bandwagon of shares, likes and comments, let me try to analyze the points this photo is trying to make. The first one: the Church is immensely rich. Well, it could be, but what do most of these riches constitute? Most of the Church's "riches" are fixed immovable assets, of which most are important human heritage. They can practically never be sold. Let's just say that the Pope sells all his adornments (provided anyone wants to buy them), maybe even Michelangelo's Pieta, and once we're at it , yes, maybe he should also sell the Sistine Chapel and have it converted to apartments. Then what? Apart from making UNESCO and the rest of human...