Skip to main content

Good! Governance - PN's proposals



Today, the Nationalist Party rolled out its first batch of electoral pledges. Simon Busuttil pledged that if elected to government, he would improve the way our Constitutional institutions are governed to strengthen their powers against wrong-doing and boost their independence. These measures are already explained in detail in our document "Restoring trust in politics"


  • A new Police Commissioner on the first day, allowed to investigate all allegations of corruption;
  • A Magistrate for Corruption, who would have investigative powers to focus specifically on corruption without requiring the Police Commissioner’s, Attorney General’s or Prime Minister’s instructions;
  • A Commissioner for Standards in Public Life, that would set rules for how politically-exposed people and workers in the civil service, ministries and positions of trust should behave to ensure they truly serve the people with ethical conduct and impartiality. MPs would also be able to work on a full-time basis to avoid conflicts of interest;
  • A new code of ethics (within the first week) for ministers prohibiting Cabinet members from doing any private work, and curbing nepotism by not allowing employment of family members in positions of trust or on public boards;
  • Constitutional changes to ensure that constitutional authorities defend the interest of the people and not the government. The highest positions would not be appointed by the Prime Minister, but via two-thirds majority in Parliament. This mechanism would apply to the President, Commissioner of Police, Army chief, Central Bank governor, the Broadcasting Authority, and the Electoral Commission.
The electorate should take a minute to appreciate the effects of these proposals on their personal lives and Malta’s wellbeing as a country. They are all proposals aimed at strengthening our institutions and make them more independent of political interference.


The PN's proposals will translate into a wider consensus over people entrusted with our top institutions. We will reduce the extent of political interference in our institutions because any potential candidates to head these structures would have to be been approved by the opposition as well. It also balances the powers in parliament, by giving the opposition the power to veto any appointments it deems non-appropriate. With some responsibility from both political forces, this should also induce a calmer political debate and cross-party mediation, reducing political attrition and subduing the “us-and-them” mentality that seems to pervade our political scene from the leadership to the party supporters. They should also reduce political influence and patronage, and will ensure true meritocracy (remember that Prime Minister?) in top Constitutional roles. We will no longer have the blue-eyed boys (sometimes not fit for purpose) holding all institutional posts, and the taxpayer will get truly competent staff to manage their country. Our MPs could work full-time, thus ensuring that they would focus solely on their parliamentary work, and away from temptation of personal gain. Voters could get better value for their vote and cleaner politics.



The fact that the Nationalist Party started off with these specific electoral pledges illustrates the party's determination to clean up politics and make sure our democracy is preserved. Busuttil is putting his money where his mouth is, actually proposing concrete measures that will effectively transform the country’s institutions’ moral fabric.  

To all those saying that Simon Busuttil is hell-bent on acquiring power, or that he has some twisted obsession with becoming Prime Minister, I say: Would someone who is driven by a desire for power decrease his own powers in favour of democratic values and a fairer political system? I guess we know the answer to that, so let’s just bury that argument once and for all, can we?

It is sad to still have to argue in favour of these proposals, since they should be part-and-parcel of any European democracy, ingrained in its institutions, its political class and its people. Also sad is the fact that after 60 years, our nation has not yet managed to assert these principles and sustain a strong democracy. It makes us angry that people of evil intent can still hijack our institutions and bring our country into disrepute… that there is nothing the citizen can do because the institutions are in bed with the very evil they are supposed to be fighting. Yes, in the past years we didn't do enough to make our country Labour-proof. We need to do that this time round.

They say history repeats itself. Once again, it feels like the PN (as part of the larger Forza Nazzjonali) is protecting our democratic values and fighting in the corner of the people against an immoral powerful establishment. How would you have sided in the 80s, when Fenech Adami’s PN was ensuring that a (once-again) corrupt Labour government was not allowed to destroy all that the Maltese held dear? Think hard and objectively. And whatever you chose or would have chosen, know that it is the same choice you’re presented with today.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who's the real monster?

I usually hate comparisons, but some very different reactions from the 'great unthinking' rabble do merit some analysis. In May this year, the notorious dog Star was found buried alive . A prima facie , this looked liked the most horrific case of animal cruelty, and is still considered so by some. The perpetrator was described by the sensitive and caring animal-lovers as a villain, a heartless monster, deserving of death, stoning, or even to be 'buried alive in the same manner'. But what did Mr. Vella actually do, according to the testimony heard in Court? Star was sick. It was shedding fur, and quite old already, and its owner did not afford the treatment. In trying to save some money from paying for the dog to be put to sleep and killed properly by vets, she gave it to Mr. Vella to have it killed himself. Nothing much to make people angry till now. Mercy-killing of very sick and suffering animals is widely done and usually acceptable. You may

Shema Yisrael, the cries of the Palestinian people

You live a peaceful life in a modest home. You've never bothered anyone and you've never caused trouble. Out of the blues, a group of people claim that they should live in your house. Why? Because they have been persecuted in a war, and they claim that some 5,000 years ago, their God had told them your home was their promised land. Somehow, the whole community agrees with their wishes, and asks you to grant them your spare-bedroom. You oblige. After a few months, they take the whole top-floor. In a few year's time, they take over your kitchen. After a few more years, they own your house and keep you and your family locked in the bathroom. They don't even allow you to get out, while they strip-search you the few times they do. Even if it's a medical emergency. Sometimes not even medical personnel and ambulances are allowed to see to your needs while your children die in your hands. Desperation starts hitting you. Life seems to offer no hopes. In moments

Why I am dropping out of the Anti-ACTA protest

Like many avid internet users, I have followed with interest the debate about ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement). After reading numerous articles, watched sensational videos, and discussed ad nauseam with friends, I have realized that what I have come across is a campaign hi-jacked by lies, myths and misconceptions as to rival Malta's misinformed divorce referendum campaign. I have to say that the videos on Youtube   got me worried. I quickly signed the petition, joined the Anti-ACTA groups, and prepared myself for a full-blown fight against the big-governments who want to intrude on our privacy and freedom of expression. Like our MEP Edward Scicluna invited us to do in the University debate last Wednesday, I did not try to understand the details of ACTA but rather saw who the players behind it were. But as usual, my logical instincts took over, and his call to not try to understand ACTA actually pushed me to read the text. And here's what I now know: ACTA is