Skip to main content

Question time: Why the Nationalists lost (Times of Malta - 01/07/2017)

Times of Malta - 01/07/2017

Question time: Why the Nationalists lost

The Nationalist Party has suffered two huge electoral defeats. What is wrong with it?


Mark Anthony Sammut, PN Local Councillor
While the 2013 election defeat was, by and large anticipated, given the long time the Nationalist Party h - ad spent in power, the infighting that blotted its final legislature and the renewal of the Labour Party, the heavy defeat suffered in 2017 took everyone by surprise.
Unfortunately, the party was not realising that, while a number of Labour supporters were joining the anti-corruption cause being pushed by the PN, another swathe of voters who had always supported the PN were defecting to Labour.
There were various factors which led to this. First and foremost, the fact that the economy was still doing well and creating a feel-good factor among the general population. Secondly, the power of incumbency was being used to its utmost.Nationalist voters were targeted and given the permits they had always been refused, backdated promotions they felt they were due and government jobs for them or their children. This was enough for them and their families to switch to Labour. But it would be too simplistic to attribute two consecutive heavy defeats solely to the luck of a booming international economy and very cheap oil prices and the extensive abuse of the powers of government.
The PN needs a lot of soul-searching to correct what it has been doing wrong if it is to win again the trust of the majority. Below are just a few points for reflection.
First of all, it needs to understand that while the values of good governance and the fight against corruption remain valid and important, for the many people who struggle to make ends meet, other bread and butter issues are more of a priority.
It does not necessarily mean that those who voted Labour agree with corruption. But it could mean they either felt the PN was still unable to tackle this issue or that their life still had a bigger probability of improving with the continuation of a Labour government than with returning the PN to power.
And this is the political narrative which, unfortunately, the PN lost and needs to rediscover.
Throughout its years in power, the PN was the party which inherited a third world country and transformed it and modernised its economy, changing it from one based solely on low-end manufacturing to one based on tourism and services, injecting high quality and high paying jobs. It was the party that introduced civil, social and political liberties, opened up education and improved employment rights.
Unfortunately, it did not manage to explain that the unpopular decisions during its last legislature were not made because it was sadistic but because it had to face the worse international recession of the last century and it was thanks to those decisions that Joseph Muscat inherited a strong and fruitful economy, ready to exploit the now booming economic reality. It allowed Muscat to take the credit for the economic success our country is experiencing.
But the biggest challenge the party faces in my opinion is that its media and political organisation are not managing to deliver its message in a sectorial, targeted manner.
While national issues being raised by the party are strong and important and are the pillars of a properly-functioning democracy, in today’s deluge of information you need to be able to segment your audience and deliver a message that directly resonates with the individual’s interests.
The new administration that will be elected to lead the party needs to make this a priority for the country to have a strong, effective Opposition that is quick to react and to propose policies addressing today’s fast-changing realities.
I am very optimistic the PN will find the right people, both young and old, new and experienced, who, together, will form a great team and lead it back to being the main driver of our country’s democratic and economic progress. I look forward to giving my all in helping it renew itself.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Elezzjoni għal Viċi Kap

Nemmen li l-Partit Nazzjonalista jeħtieġ Viċi-Kap li jkompli jsaħħaħ il-proċess ta' tiġdid li għaddej minnu l-Partit stess, biex ikun jista' jkompli jwettaq il-bidliet pożittivi f'pajjiżna. Għalhekk kien ta' pjaċir għalija li nhar is-Sibt li għadda kont wieħed minn tal-ewwel li iffirmajt in-nomina ta' Dr. Simon Busuttil għal din il-kariga tant importanti. Nawguralu minn qalbi.

Why I am dropping out of the Anti-ACTA protest

Like many avid internet users, I have followed with interest the debate about ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement). After reading numerous articles, watched sensational videos, and discussed ad nauseam with friends, I have realized that what I have come across is a campaign hi-jacked by lies, myths and misconceptions as to rival Malta's misinformed divorce referendum campaign. I have to say that the videos on Youtube   got me worried. I quickly signed the petition, joined the Anti-ACTA groups, and prepared myself for a full-blown fight against the big-governments who want to intrude on our privacy and freedom of expression. Like our MEP Edward Scicluna invited us to do in the University debate last Wednesday, I did not try to understand the details of ACTA but rather saw who the players behind it were. But as usual, my logical instincts took over, and his call to not try to understand ACTA actually pushed me to read the text. And here's what I now know: ACTA is ...

Who's the real monster?

I usually hate comparisons, but some very different reactions from the 'great unthinking' rabble do merit some analysis. In May this year, the notorious dog Star was found buried alive . A prima facie , this looked liked the most horrific case of animal cruelty, and is still considered so by some. The perpetrator was described by the sensitive and caring animal-lovers as a villain, a heartless monster, deserving of death, stoning, or even to be 'buried alive in the same manner'. But what did Mr. Vella actually do, according to the testimony heard in Court? Star was sick. It was shedding fur, and quite old already, and its owner did not afford the treatment. In trying to save some money from paying for the dog to be put to sleep and killed properly by vets, she gave it to Mr. Vella to have it killed himself. Nothing much to make people angry till now. Mercy-killing of very sick and suffering animals is widely done and usually a...