Skip to main content

Il-"Ferris Tapes"


Matul din il-ġimgħa, fuq is-site manueldelia.com, ġew ippublikati ‘l hekk imsejħa Ferris Tapes. Fi ftit kliem, dawn huma intervisti qosra u irrekordjati mal-ex-Spettur tal-Pulizija, ex-investigatur tal-FIAU u illum whistle-blower, Jonathan Ferris. Dawn l-intervisti saru mill-blogger Manuel Delia flimkien mal-ġurnalista Ellen Trapp mill-ARD TV (organizzazzjoni konġunta tal-istazzjonijiet pubbliċi reġjonali tal-Ġermanja).

Dawn l-intervisti maqsumin fuq erba’ recordings ta’ madwar 10 minuti ‘l waħda. L-aħħar parti tal-intervista tinsab fil-link https://manueldelia.com/2017/11/listen-ferris-tapes-part-4/. Minn hawnhekk wieħed jista’ wkoll isib il-link għat-tliet partijiet l-oħra.

X’joħroġ minn dawn l-intervisti?

L-ewwel nett, Ferris jitkellem fuq iż-żmien li għamel fl-Economic Crimes Unit tal-Korp tal-Pulizija. Jitkellem fuq kif mexxa l-prosekuzzjoni fil-każ ta’ John Dalli, każ ta’ frodi fuq anzjani Amerikani, u kif lesta r-rapport f’Novembru 2015. Sentejn ilu. Il-prosekuzzjoni ittellgħet il-Qorti biss issa, wara l-qtil ta’ Daphne Caruana Galizia u l-akkuża li f’Malta spiċċat is-saltna tad-dritt.

Kien beda jinvestiga wkoll il-każ tal-frodi tal-visas lil-Libjani, liema każ pero’ l-iskwadra tiegħu ma kellhiex biżżejjed riżorsi biex tara d-dokumentazzjoni kollha u tmexxi fil-Qorti.

Tkellem ukoll fuq l-iskandlu taż-żejt, li kien qed jinvestiga hu wkoll u li fih kien diġa’ ressaq nies il-Qorti. Meta mistoqsi, ikkonferma li iva, f’dak iż-żmien kien jitħalla jinvestiga bil-libertà kollha, mentri mal-bidla fil-Gvern beda jitwaqqaf, daqqa b’nuqqas ta’ riżorsi u daqqa mis-superjuri tiegħu.

B’mod partikolari, jiżvela li l-unika raġuni għala kien talab biex jitmexxa mill-Korp tal-Pulizija kienet li f’Mejju 2016, meta kien qed jinvestiga każ ta’ frodi, Segretarju ta’ Ministru partikolari kien talbu informazzjoni fuq dan il-każ, f’email li fiha kien ikkuppjat il-Ministru innifsu. Din hija xi ħaġa illegali, għax il-Pulizija ma tistax tiżvela informazzjoni partikolari fuq investigazzjoni, lanqas lill-Ministru. Żvela wkoll li s-Supretendent Abdilla, li kien is-superjur tiegħu, qallu biex jirrispondi ħalli ma joħloqx “inkwiet diplomatiku”. Hu baqa’ jirrifjuta u talab li jiċċaqlaq. Illum nafu li dak il-Ministru ma kien ħadd ħlief il-Ministru Karmenu Abela, u kien għalhekk li l-Oppożizzjoni, is-Soċjetà Ċivili, u diversi ġurnali indipendenti, talbu pubblikament għar-riżenja tiegħu. Jekk le, ir-responsabbilità ma tkun ta’ ħadd ħlief tal-Prim Ministru.

Wara dan l-inċident Ferris kien ġie sekondat mal-FIAU. Ikkonferma li qabel mar hu, l-FIAU kienet ġa lestiet rapporti fuq il-Bank Pilatus u għaddiethom lill-Pulizija, liema rapporti ma sar xejn fuqhom sal-ġurnata tal-lum. Jikkonferma li l-Avukat Ġenerali naqas minn dmiru għax għandu l-poter li jibda investigazzjonijiet marbuta mal-ħasil ta’ flus. Jikkonferma wkoll li l-Avukat Ġenerali talbu informazzjoni fuq il-whistle-blower Russa, Maria Efimova, biex jipprova jgħin lill-Gvern jiskreditaha, wara li din kixfet li kienet rat dokumenti li juru li l-kumpanija Egrant hija tal-mara tal-Prim Ministru, u li kienet rat transazzjonijiet ta’ miljuni mit-tifla tal-President Aliyev tal-Azerbaijan għal kontijiet tal-kumpanija Egrant, flimkien ma’ transazzjonijiet oħra lejn Michelle Buttigieg, il-partner fin-negozju ta’ Michelle Muscat.

Din hija akkuża serjissima li turi ksur ta’ liġi gravi mill-Avukat Ġenerali innifsu.

Ferris isostni wkoll li persuni qed isegwuh, u li talab għal protezzjoni għax qed jibża’ għal ħajtu. U bir-raġun. Nafu li r-reġim tal-Azerbaijan mhux l-ewwel darba li ħeles minn ġurnalisti u nies li kienu qed jaħdmu kontrieh.

Ferris bħalissa għaddej fi proċedura fil-Qrati biex jiġġieled kontra d-diskriminazzjoni li sofra meta tkeċċa mill-FIAU. L-Avukat Ġenerali talab li l-każ jinstema’ wara bibien magħluqa. Ferris qed jiġġieled dan u diġa’ ddikjara li lest jibqa’ tiela’ quddiem il-Qorti Kostituzzjonali, u jekk hemm bżonn quddiem il-Qorti Ewropea tad-Drittijiet tal-Bniedem fi Strasburgu.

Minħabba raġunijiet ta’ segretezza li kien marbut bihom bħala impjega tal-FIAU, Ferris projbiet milli joħroġ ċertu dettalji. Għalkemm huwa qal li f’dan il-każ il-liġijiet li suppost qegħdin hemm biex kriminali ma jkunux jafu minn qabel li qed jiġu investigati, qed jintużaw biex il-kriminali jiġu protetti.

Iżda ma waqafx hawn. Ferris ħareġ ukoll dikjarazzjoni fejn qal li “Malta 100% korrotta, mill-President ‘l isfel”. Huwa sfida lill-President biex jekk hija verament gwardjann tal-Kostituzzjoni, tiftaħlu libell ħalli biex jiddefendi lilu nnifsu jitneħħewlu l-obbligi ta’ segretezza u jkun jista’ jikxef dak kollu li jaf. S’issa l-President ma laqgħetx din l-isfida, u qed tippreferi tkompli tilgħabha tal-paladin tal-karità flok taqdi d-dmir li tobbligaha bih il-Kostituzzjoni.


Għandna ħafna ta’ x’hiex nirringrazzjaw lil Jonathan Ferris, li b’sagrifiċċju u riskju personali qed jiġġieled għall-ġustizzja u għad-drittijiet tagħna bħala ċittadini ta’ pajjiż demokratiku.


Dan l-artiklu deher fil-Mument tal-Ħadd 3 ta' Diċembru 2017.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who's the real monster?

I usually hate comparisons, but some very different reactions from the 'great unthinking' rabble do merit some analysis. In May this year, the notorious dog Star was found buried alive . A prima facie , this looked liked the most horrific case of animal cruelty, and is still considered so by some. The perpetrator was described by the sensitive and caring animal-lovers as a villain, a heartless monster, deserving of death, stoning, or even to be 'buried alive in the same manner'. But what did Mr. Vella actually do, according to the testimony heard in Court? Star was sick. It was shedding fur, and quite old already, and its owner did not afford the treatment. In trying to save some money from paying for the dog to be put to sleep and killed properly by vets, she gave it to Mr. Vella to have it killed himself. Nothing much to make people angry till now. Mercy-killing of very sick and suffering animals is widely done and usually acceptable. You may

Shema Yisrael, the cries of the Palestinian people

You live a peaceful life in a modest home. You've never bothered anyone and you've never caused trouble. Out of the blues, a group of people claim that they should live in your house. Why? Because they have been persecuted in a war, and they claim that some 5,000 years ago, their God had told them your home was their promised land. Somehow, the whole community agrees with their wishes, and asks you to grant them your spare-bedroom. You oblige. After a few months, they take the whole top-floor. In a few year's time, they take over your kitchen. After a few more years, they own your house and keep you and your family locked in the bathroom. They don't even allow you to get out, while they strip-search you the few times they do. Even if it's a medical emergency. Sometimes not even medical personnel and ambulances are allowed to see to your needs while your children die in your hands. Desperation starts hitting you. Life seems to offer no hopes. In moments

Why I am dropping out of the Anti-ACTA protest

Like many avid internet users, I have followed with interest the debate about ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement). After reading numerous articles, watched sensational videos, and discussed ad nauseam with friends, I have realized that what I have come across is a campaign hi-jacked by lies, myths and misconceptions as to rival Malta's misinformed divorce referendum campaign. I have to say that the videos on Youtube   got me worried. I quickly signed the petition, joined the Anti-ACTA groups, and prepared myself for a full-blown fight against the big-governments who want to intrude on our privacy and freedom of expression. Like our MEP Edward Scicluna invited us to do in the University debate last Wednesday, I did not try to understand the details of ACTA but rather saw who the players behind it were. But as usual, my logical instincts took over, and his call to not try to understand ACTA actually pushed me to read the text. And here's what I now know: ACTA is