Skip to main content

Infallu test ieħor





Dil-ġimgħa ġie żvelat x’hemm fid-draft tar-rappot tal-Moneyval, kif inhu magħruf fil-qosor il-Kumitat ta’ Esperti dwar l-Evalwazzjoni ta’ Miżuri Kontra l-Ħasil tal-Flus u l-Iffinanzjar tat-Terroriżmu, kumitat permanenti fi ħdan il-Kunsill tal-Ewropa.

Dan il-Kumitat jittestja l-pajjiżi appuntu dwar il-miżuri li jimplimenta biex jiġġieled il-ħasil tal-flus u l-użu ta’ dawn il-flus biex jiġi ffinanzjat it-terroriżmu. Jidher li fit-test li dan il-Kumitat għamel fuq Malta, Malta falliet. M’għaddietx.

Huwa veru li dan ir-rapport ikun konkluż biss f’Lulju, u allura Malta baqagħlha ftit xhur ċans biex tirranġa l-affarijiet u tirranġa l-marka tagħha. Però huwa veru wkoll li fil-preżent, ma ngħaddux. U ma niskantax. Dan ilna ngħiduh għal żmien twil. Għax kif jista’ jkun tiġġieled il-ħasil tal-flus meta twaqqaf l-investigazzjonijiet għax ikunu jinvolvu Ministru u c-Chief-of-Staff tiegħu? Kif jista’ jkun tiġġieled il-ħasil ta’ flus meta int l-unika Gvern b’nies involuti fil-Panama Papers li ma tressaq ħadd il-Qorti? Kif jista’ jkun qed tiġġieled il-ħasil ta’ flus meta tiġi ppubblikata evidenza ċara li kien hemm tixħim u arranġamenti għal ħlas ta’ €5,000 kuljum f’but nies mill-Gvern minn kuntratt massiv bħalma kien dak tal-powerstation?

U kif jista’ jkun tbellagħhielna li hawn miżuri effettivi ta’ due-diligence, meta nsiru nafu li l-passaport tagħna inbiegħ lil nies suspettużi, li mhu suppost qatt li ngħataw ċittadinanza Maltija? Kif jista’ jkun nemmnu li Malta qed tgħin fil-ġlieda kontra t-terroriżmu, meta skont ir-rapport tal-Awditur Ġenerali tajna viżas lil mijiet ta’ Alġerini li l-Pulizija taw rakkomandazzjoni biex ma tingħatalhomx, għax huma ta’ theddida għas-sigurtà tal-Ewropa?

Nhar it-Tnejn stess, meta ġie żvelat dan ir-rapport tal-Moneyval, il-blogger Amerikan Kenneth Rijock, li jinvestiga ħafna l-kriminalità finanzjarja, ikkummenta dwar l-għoti ta’ liċenzja lil Pilatus Bank. Jgħid li l-investigaturi Amerikani kienu ilhom jinvestigawh mill-2011. Kellhom warrant biex ifittxu fl-emails tiegħu, mill-2014. Jistaqsi kif qatt jista’ jkun li l-Gvern u l-Awtoritajiet Maltin għamlu due-diligence kif suppost meta dawn xorta waħda tawh liċenzja. Jgħid li “kwalunkwe tfittxija ta’ due-diligence kif suppost kienet issib ir-rabta li kellu Ali Sadr Hasheminejad mal-Iran, li kienet taħt sanzjonijiet.” Jistaqsi wkoll jekk din il-liċenzja ingħatatx wara “l-arti ta’ ħlas ta’ tixħim”, għax jgħid li “ebda direttur ta’ compliance li jiswa ismu ma kien qatt japprova din il-liċenzja...xi ħaġa korrot żgur li ġrat biex din inħarġet.”

Sadattant, ħadd mill-Gvern ma jerfa’ r-responsabbilità. Lanqas il-Ministru Edward Scicluna, li huwa l-Ministru li taħtu saret din il-ħsara kollha lir-reputazzjoni ta’ Malta, fost l-oħrajn minħabba n-nuqqas ta’ azzjoni tiegħu, mhu lest jerfa’ responsabbilità politika għal dan il-falliment. Ċertament mhux ħa jagħmlu dan Joseph Muscat u Konrad Mizzi, li responsabbilità politika lanqas biss jafu fejn toqgħod. Ara l-kontijiet tal-bank u l-uffiċċji tan-Nexia BT, dawk jafu fejn huma. Anzi, biex ma jevitaw l-iskariġġ tawhom uffiċċju f’Kastillja stess.

Tweġġa’ meta pajjiżek jibda jissemma’ biss fil-ħażin. Tweġġa’ meta tiltaqa’ ma’ barranin, jew tmur barra minn Malta, u tisma’ biss kummenti dwar bejgħ ta’ passaporti, dwar ħasil ta’ flus, dwar Ministri fil-Panama Papers, dwar Mafja. Tweġġa’ meta kull test li jiffaċċja pajjiżek jispiċċa jew jitkaxkar fih, bħalma għamel fir-rapport tat-Transparency International, jew ma jgħaddix, bħalma għamel fir-rapport tal-Kummissjoni Venezja u issa fir-rapport tal-Moneyval.

Iżda tweġġa’ aktar meta tifhem li dan kollu stajna nevitawh li kieku fit-tmexxija għandna politiċi u Gvern responsabbli, li jġibu isem Malta u mhux buthom l-ewwel u qabel kollox.


Dan l-artiklu deher fil-ħarġa tan-Nazzjon tal-Erbgħa 27 ta' Marzu 2019

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who's the real monster?

I usually hate comparisons, but some very different reactions from the 'great unthinking' rabble do merit some analysis. In May this year, the notorious dog Star was found buried alive . A prima facie , this looked liked the most horrific case of animal cruelty, and is still considered so by some. The perpetrator was described by the sensitive and caring animal-lovers as a villain, a heartless monster, deserving of death, stoning, or even to be 'buried alive in the same manner'. But what did Mr. Vella actually do, according to the testimony heard in Court? Star was sick. It was shedding fur, and quite old already, and its owner did not afford the treatment. In trying to save some money from paying for the dog to be put to sleep and killed properly by vets, she gave it to Mr. Vella to have it killed himself. Nothing much to make people angry till now. Mercy-killing of very sick and suffering animals is widely done and usually acceptable. You may

Shema Yisrael, the cries of the Palestinian people

You live a peaceful life in a modest home. You've never bothered anyone and you've never caused trouble. Out of the blues, a group of people claim that they should live in your house. Why? Because they have been persecuted in a war, and they claim that some 5,000 years ago, their God had told them your home was their promised land. Somehow, the whole community agrees with their wishes, and asks you to grant them your spare-bedroom. You oblige. After a few months, they take the whole top-floor. In a few year's time, they take over your kitchen. After a few more years, they own your house and keep you and your family locked in the bathroom. They don't even allow you to get out, while they strip-search you the few times they do. Even if it's a medical emergency. Sometimes not even medical personnel and ambulances are allowed to see to your needs while your children die in your hands. Desperation starts hitting you. Life seems to offer no hopes. In moments

Why I am dropping out of the Anti-ACTA protest

Like many avid internet users, I have followed with interest the debate about ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement). After reading numerous articles, watched sensational videos, and discussed ad nauseam with friends, I have realized that what I have come across is a campaign hi-jacked by lies, myths and misconceptions as to rival Malta's misinformed divorce referendum campaign. I have to say that the videos on Youtube   got me worried. I quickly signed the petition, joined the Anti-ACTA groups, and prepared myself for a full-blown fight against the big-governments who want to intrude on our privacy and freedom of expression. Like our MEP Edward Scicluna invited us to do in the University debate last Wednesday, I did not try to understand the details of ACTA but rather saw who the players behind it were. But as usual, my logical instincts took over, and his call to not try to understand ACTA actually pushed me to read the text. And here's what I now know: ACTA is