Skip to main content

Kwoti fil-Parlament




Din il-ġimgħa ġie mniedi dokument ta’ konsultazzjoni varat mill-Gvern li jipproponi emendi Kostituzzjonali biex jiżdiedu s-siġġijiet fil-Parlament sabiex is-sess l-inqas rappreżentat, fil-preżent is-sess femminili, jiżdiedulu s-siġġijiet meta jkollu inqas minn 40% rappreżentanza. Hu propost li l-ammont ta’ siġġijiet miżjuda jkun sa massimu ta’ 12, ikun maqsum b’mod ugwali bejn iż-żewġ partiti (sabiex id-differenza fis-siġġijiet tibqa’ l-istess), jidħol fis-seħħ biss meta jitilgħu żewġ partiti, u jmur għand in-nisa li jkunu baqgħu mdendlin fl-aħħar count, imbagħad wara dawn jitqassmu l-voti tal-irġiel li ma jkunux telgħu u jkunu baqgħu imdendlin, imbagħad jintużaw il-voti ta’ dawk li jitilgħu bl-elezzjoni każwali.

Ejja nħarsu ftit lejn l-istatistika u lejn il-fatti. Fl-aħħar elezzjoni ġenerali, fil-listi li ġew preżentati lill-votanti kien hemm 280 raġel u 68 mara. Meta tħares lejn il-ħames kandidati li ġew eletti minn kull distrett (qabel ma tikkunsidra n-nisa eletti mill-elezzjonijiet każwali u d-deputati eletti bis-siġġijiet miżjuda mill-korrezzjonijiet Kostituzzjonali), issib li ġew eletti 55 raġel u 10 nisa. Dan ifisser li 19.6% tal-kandidati rġiel ġew eletti, u 14.7% tal-kandidati nisa ġew eletti. Id-differenza fil-probabbilità li tkun elett bejn in-nisa u l-irġiel kienet waħda trivjali ta’ inqas minn 5%.

Jekk wieħed iħares lejn l-elezzjonijiet tal-Parlament Ewropew li għaddew, fil-lista tal-vot kien hemm 24 raġel u 8 nisa.  Meta tħares lejn is-6 kandidati eletti mill-elezzjoni oriġinali, issib li telgħu 2 irġiel u 4 nisa. Li jfisser li 8% biss tal-kandidati rġiel ġew eletti, mentri 50% tal-kandidati nisa ġew eletti. Id-differenza turi li kien hemm iktar minn 5 darbiet iżjed probabbilità għan-nisa li jkunu eletti milli għall-irġiel!

Xi jfisser dan? Dan juri b’mod ċar li f’Malta m’hawn l-ebda problema għal votant biex jivvota għan-nisa. Il-votant Malti ma jbati bl-ebda preġudizzju, u dan ma joħloq ebda opportunità inqas jew probabbilità inqas għan-nisa li jkunu eletti. L-għeruq tal-problema hija li jkun hemm nuqqas ta’ kandidati nisa fejn jidħlu l-elezzjonijiet tal-Parlament Malti. Infatti, l-istatistika turi illi li kieku kien hemm kandidati nisa daqs kemm kien hemm kandidati rġiel, b’dik l-istess probabbilità kienu jiġu eletti madwar 29 mara u 36 raġel, li jfisser 44.6% kienu jkunu nisa u ma kien ikun hemm bżonn l-ebda mekkaniżmu ta’ kwoti.

Mela allura, il-problema li rridu nindirizzaw hija li naraw li jkun hemm aktar kandidati nisa. Mela ejja naraw li m’hemm l-ebda ostaklu biex mara tkun kandidat, jew toqgħod lura milli tipprova tkun Membru Parlamentari. Ejja naraw li l-ħinijiet tal-Parlament ikunu ħinijiet diċenti, b’paga diċenti, u bil-possibilità li tkun full-time. Ejja naraw li l-Partiti jkunu inċentivati jippreżentaw listi bilanċjati, ħalli jsir sforz aktar li jinstabu u jiġu ppreżentati kandidati nisa. Dawn iva huma kollha miżuri li naqbel magħhom, u li ċert iwasslu biex b’mod naturali jkun hemm aktar nisa fil-Parlament.

Imma jien kontra kull forma ta’ tbagħbis ta’ riżultat demokratiku biex noħolqu r-riżultat li nixtiequ. Xi ħaġa bħal din tmur kontra kull prinċipju ta’ xi tfisser demokrazija rappreżentattiva, fejn il-votant jagħżel hu lil min irid jirrappreżentah.

Demokrazija liberali tfisser ugwaljanza fl-opportunità, mhux ugwaljanza fir-riżultat. L-ugwaljanza fir-riżultat hija ideoloġija komunista, u toħloq preċedent li jqabbadna niżla li diffiċli nwaqqfu.

Għax fejn ħa tieqaf tagħmel kwoti? Fuq liema karatteristiċi tieqaf tidentifika kif il-Parlament ikun ‘inklussiv’? U dan, kif inhu konformi mal-liġijiet li għadda dan il-Gvern stess fejn il-ġeneru sar identifikazzjoni b’għażla tal-persuna, u mhux aktar xi ħaġa bijoloġika? X’jiġri jekk jien illum nagħżel li nkun identifikat bħala mara, inkun elett bi kwota, u mbagħad wara nagħżel li nkun identifikat bħala raġel? U min għażel li jidentifika s-sess tiegħu b’X, ma liema kwota jgħodd? Jew ħa jkun hemm kwota oħra għal dan il-ġeneru?

Dawn huma mistoqsijiet li jien nemmen li lanqas biss għandna naslu għalihom. L-individwu m’għandux ikun identifikat bis-sess, bl-orjentazzjoni jew b’xi karatteristika fiżika, imma bl-abbilità tiegħu li jirrapreżenta lil votant. U dik għandu jkun biss il-votant li jiddeċiedi dwarha, mingħajr l-ebda ‘espert’ ma jipprova jgħidlu li qed jagħżel ħażin u ‘jikkoreġilu’ r-riżultat.



Dan l-artiklu deher fil-ħarġa tal-Mument tal-Ħadd 31 ta' Marzu 2019

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who's the real monster?

I usually hate comparisons, but some very different reactions from the 'great unthinking' rabble do merit some analysis. In May this year, the notorious dog Star was found buried alive . A prima facie , this looked liked the most horrific case of animal cruelty, and is still considered so by some. The perpetrator was described by the sensitive and caring animal-lovers as a villain, a heartless monster, deserving of death, stoning, or even to be 'buried alive in the same manner'. But what did Mr. Vella actually do, according to the testimony heard in Court? Star was sick. It was shedding fur, and quite old already, and its owner did not afford the treatment. In trying to save some money from paying for the dog to be put to sleep and killed properly by vets, she gave it to Mr. Vella to have it killed himself. Nothing much to make people angry till now. Mercy-killing of very sick and suffering animals is widely done and usually acceptable. You may

Shema Yisrael, the cries of the Palestinian people

You live a peaceful life in a modest home. You've never bothered anyone and you've never caused trouble. Out of the blues, a group of people claim that they should live in your house. Why? Because they have been persecuted in a war, and they claim that some 5,000 years ago, their God had told them your home was their promised land. Somehow, the whole community agrees with their wishes, and asks you to grant them your spare-bedroom. You oblige. After a few months, they take the whole top-floor. In a few year's time, they take over your kitchen. After a few more years, they own your house and keep you and your family locked in the bathroom. They don't even allow you to get out, while they strip-search you the few times they do. Even if it's a medical emergency. Sometimes not even medical personnel and ambulances are allowed to see to your needs while your children die in your hands. Desperation starts hitting you. Life seems to offer no hopes. In moments

Why I am dropping out of the Anti-ACTA protest

Like many avid internet users, I have followed with interest the debate about ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement). After reading numerous articles, watched sensational videos, and discussed ad nauseam with friends, I have realized that what I have come across is a campaign hi-jacked by lies, myths and misconceptions as to rival Malta's misinformed divorce referendum campaign. I have to say that the videos on Youtube   got me worried. I quickly signed the petition, joined the Anti-ACTA groups, and prepared myself for a full-blown fight against the big-governments who want to intrude on our privacy and freedom of expression. Like our MEP Edward Scicluna invited us to do in the University debate last Wednesday, I did not try to understand the details of ACTA but rather saw who the players behind it were. But as usual, my logical instincts took over, and his call to not try to understand ACTA actually pushed me to read the text. And here's what I now know: ACTA is